2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-3066-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- and long-term reliability of heart rate variability indices during repetitive low-force work

Abstract: We conclude that HRV can be used as a reliable and feasible marker of autonomic activity in occupational studies of repetitive low-force work.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SD1 (standard deviation of points perpendicular to the line-of-equality) measured the short-term HRV and is associated with the influence of parasympathetic activity. Moreover, it is similar to RMSSD (root mean square of successive IBI differences) and associated positively to HF power (power of highfrequency band: 0.15 -0.4 Hz)[29,64,65].…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…SD1 (standard deviation of points perpendicular to the line-of-equality) measured the short-term HRV and is associated with the influence of parasympathetic activity. Moreover, it is similar to RMSSD (root mean square of successive IBI differences) and associated positively to HF power (power of highfrequency band: 0.15 -0.4 Hz)[29,64,65].…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We will also explore other aspects of HRV according to Task Force Standards (35) to get an overall impression of the subjects' HRV. In a recent study that examined the reliability of HRV measures, the sample size was estimated to 20 subjects in each group to detect a mean change of 20% in RMSSD, and 20-50 subjects in each group to detect a change of 10% (36). A difference of 10-20% has been considered to be clinically important (36).…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study that examined the reliability of HRV measures, the sample size was estimated to 20 subjects in each group to detect a mean change of 20% in RMSSD, and 20-50 subjects in each group to detect a change of 10% (36). A difference of 10-20% has been considered to be clinically important (36). This value has also been used by other researchers investigating changes in HRV from manual treatment (37).…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficients of variation were 0.15, 0.20, 0.29, 0.27, and 0.20, respectively, which were similar to those measured in a validation study. 22 …”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%