2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05176-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- and long term outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RT patients had a lower duration of post-operative hospital stay. These results are similar to the previous reviews on this aspect and add to the body of the already available evidence ( 9 , 10 ). Our findings underscore that in women of reproductive age with early-stage cervical cancer, RT can be used in place of RH as a way to preserve fertility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…RT patients had a lower duration of post-operative hospital stay. These results are similar to the previous reviews on this aspect and add to the body of the already available evidence ( 9 , 10 ). Our findings underscore that in women of reproductive age with early-stage cervical cancer, RT can be used in place of RH as a way to preserve fertility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They noted a significantly prolonged operative time for RT compared to RH, but the 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were similar between the two groups. Based on these findings, the authors concluded that RT has a similar efficacy and safety profile compared to RH and recommended the use of this technique for women of reproductive age who wish to have future pregnancies (9). Another recent review, using five studies, concluded that RT, particularly the vaginal mode, is safe and effective for the management of early-stage cervical cancer with lesion size of <2 cm and negative tumor margins (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The change is associated with the development of medical standards in some countries, increased cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus vaccination coverage and enhancement of women's health awareness. These interventions seem oncologically safe in the current selection of patients with low-stage and low-grade disease ( 32 ). Internationally, the chance for recurrence in early stage cervical cancer is 6–9% ( 33 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small and limited lesions can be treated by less invasive, fertility-preserving procedures like conization; LLETZ (Large Loop Excision of Transformation Zone); simple or radical trachelectomy (removing the cervix and upper vagina but not the body of the uterus) (Shuurman et al 2021). The oncological prognosis after these surgical procedures is acceptable with low recurrence rate in stages lower that IB1 (Prodromidou et al 2019). However, about 4% of the fertility-preserving procedures carry a higher risk of cancer development like positive resection margins, positive lymph nodes, or other features that necessitate a more invasive operation or the use of adjuvant chemo-and/or radiotherapy (Berman & Schiller, 2017;Bhatla et al 2019).…”
Section: Therapeutic Approaches To Cervical Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%