Treatment of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is one of the most critical challenges in the modern era of liver surgery (1). In addition to the highly demanding technique and insidious diagnostic work-up, the procedure is often complicated by potentially life-threatening postoperative sequelae. Therefore, accuracy in the pre-operative indication and planning is paramount to mitigate this risk and to improve the outcomes. The decision to either perform a right or left hepatectomy should be based on several factors, including tumor extension, presence of vascular infiltration, study of the future liver remnant (FLR) and center experience. Franken and colleagues reported their valuable experience with patients affected by PHC (2), comparing 76 left sided liver resections (LH) vs. 102 right sided liver resections (RH) for PHC, to highlight potential advantages of one approach over the other. Authors showed that no statistically significant differences could be found in both short-and long-term outcomes between the two groups. Interestingly, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) was more frequently observed after RH (22%) compared to LH (11%), almost reaching a significant threshold (P=0.052). Of note, incidence of PHLF seems to be influenced more by the combination of liver and portal vein resection (P=0.005), rather than by the side of the hepatectomy. Despite the efforts to obtain a radical treatment and the risk of severe morbidity, a R0 resection was obtained in only 39% of the cases, without differences between leftand right-sided hepatectomies (40% and 39%, respectively, P=0.849), having considered any margin <1 mm as R1 including all planes.