2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4532-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- and long-term effects of nicotine and the histone deacetylase inhibitor phenylbutyrate on novel object recognition in zebrafish

Abstract: Zebrafish were innately reluctant or prone to explore colored novel objects, so drug effects on innate preference for objects can be evaluated changing the color of objects with a simple geometry. Zebrafish exhibited recognition memory for novel objects with similar innate significance. Interestingly, nicotine and PhB significantly modified innate object preference.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, zebrafish preferentially spent more time near familiar than novel objects when complex objects of different sizes (LEGO® figures) were used 3 . These inconsistencies may be associated with differences in the experimental protocol used in zebrafish research, which are often complex and difficult to replicate since there are a large number of existing variables (e.g., different object shapes, sizes and textures and/or even the presence or absence of habituation) 22,24,26,27 . To circumvent these issues, we established a protocol aiming to reduce experimental variables allowing precise data reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, zebrafish preferentially spent more time near familiar than novel objects when complex objects of different sizes (LEGO® figures) were used 3 . These inconsistencies may be associated with differences in the experimental protocol used in zebrafish research, which are often complex and difficult to replicate since there are a large number of existing variables (e.g., different object shapes, sizes and textures and/or even the presence or absence of habituation) 22,24,26,27 . To circumvent these issues, we established a protocol aiming to reduce experimental variables allowing precise data reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the use of different protocols, object shapes, sizes, and colors among laboratories 22,24,26 associated with the lack of behavioral parameters to measure a proper interaction with objects, complicate the interpretation regarding preference or aversion to novel objects 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, an opaque partition between the fish and the stimuli was removed and the two side‐by‐side compartments became visually accessible: one containing the microcentrifuge tubes and the other kept empty (Figure G). The colours of the microcentrifuge tubes were chosen based on previous work that showed an innate zebrafish preference towards red and green objects . The percentage cumulative time fish spent near each compartment (objects vs empty) was used to calculate the object preference score [% T objects /(% T objects + % T empty )] and stimuli exploration score [( T objects + T empty )/ T total ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colours were switched between replicates to avoid a specific preference towards the colour. We used colour‐cue objects because it has been reported that zebrafish are better in discriminating colour changes than changes in object shape or size …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zebra sh show multiple advantages, including high physiological and genetic homology to mammals, rapid development, ease of genetic and experimental manipulations, sensitivity to cognitive tests as well as cost-and space-effectiveness (18). Although zebra sh are newcomers to studies of learning and memory, they are capable of performing well in a range of learning tasks such as, avoidance learning (19), alternation spatial memory task (20), associative learning task (21), object recognition (22), and automated learning paradigm (23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%