Short‐ and long‐distance moves of young adults during the transition to adulthood in Britain

Abstract

This paper examines spatial mobility of young adults in England and Wales in the 1990s and the 2000s. We investigate short-and long-distance moves of young people by cohort and gender adjusted for individuals' socio-economic characteristics and changes in other life domains. We study how much employment, partnership, and family changes explain variation in spatial mobility across birth cohorts and between males and females. We apply multistate event history analysis to data from the British Household Panel Survey. We move beyond a single-event approach and analyse moving trajectories of young adults. The results show that the youngest cohort (born in [1985][1986][1987][1988][1989][1990] leaves the parental home later than the two older cohorts (born in 1974-1979 and 1980-1984), but once they leave the parental nest, they exhibit elevated levels of spatial mobility. We find that females leave the parental home earlier than males; however, there are no gender differences in the levels of higher order moves. By contrast, socio-economic differences in spatial mobility are persistent; young people from advantaged backgrounds are spatially more mobile than those who come from disadvantaged families. Changes in educational enrolment and level, partnership status, and economic activity explain only little of the differences in spatial mobility across cohorts and between males and females suggesting also the importance of other motives behind the moves. The results are similar for short-and long-distance moves, although the risk levels are higher for the former. KEYWORDSBritish Household Panel Survey, England and Wales, event history analysis, spatial mobility, transition to adulthood, young adults

Ethnic residential segregation: A matter of ethnic minority household characteristics?

“…We used conditional logit modelling to analyse households formed by young adults of Moroccan descent-the largest ethnic-minority group in Belgium-in Belgium's two largest cities, Antwerp and Brussels. We chose to focus on households formed by young adults because they often experience many changes to household composition and residence as part of their life cycle transitions (Elzinga & Liefbroer, 2007;Mulder & Hooimeijer, 2002;Pelikh & Kulu, 2018).…”

“…To address this gap and test the association between household composition characteristics and ethnic minorities' residential segregation, we use a conditional logit model to analyse households formed by young adults of Moroccan descent-Moroccans are the largest ethnic-minority group in Belgium-in Belgium's two largest cities, Antwerp and Brussels. We choose to focus on young adults because this group of people often experiences many life cycle transitions that lead to household composition changes and residential mobility (Mulder & Hooimeijer, 2002;Pelikh & Kulu, 2018).…”

Distinguishing tempo and ageing effects in migration

“…As noted earlier, the data reported here is for all moves, irrespective of their order. Very few migration studies have, however, considered the order of moves and examined whether changes in migration behaviour are order specific (Kulu, Lundholm, and Malmberg 2018;Pelikh and Kulu 2018;Bernard and Kolk 2019), and this is because of the limited availability of adequate data (Bernard 2017b). It is therefore unclear whether changes in migration behaviour are order specific and consequently whether all-move data is suitable for the analysis of changes in the timing of migration and tempo effects.…”

“…In recent years, a growing body of literature has developed that suggests a progressive shift of migration-age schedules to older ages in a number of countries, including the United Kingdom (Lomax and Stillwell 2018), the United States (Foster 2017), and Australia (Bell et al 2018b). This delay is to be expected given that the age patterns of migration closely mirror the age structure of the life course (Bernard, Bell, and Charles-Edwards 2014) because key transitions to adulthood -including exit from education and entry into the labour force, union formation, and childbirth -often trigger a change of residence (Bernard, Bell, and Charles-Edwards 2016;Mulder 1993;Pelikh and Kulu 2018;Vidal and Lutz 2018). Ample evidence suggests that the age structure of the life course has evolved over time in a way that key transitions to adulthood have been progressively postponed to older ages and become more protracted (Billari and Liefbroer 2010;Furstenberg 2013).…”

Migration in China: A cohort approach to understanding past and future trends

“…Using retrospective residential histories, Falkingham, Sage, Stone, and Vlachantoni () identified an upward trend in lifetime migration in England for cohorts born in the first half of the 20th century, which was caused by an increase in repeat migration and younger mean ages at first migration (Bernard, ). Focusing on young adults, Vidal and Lutz () found stable levels of lifetime immobility among cohorts born between 1939 and 1971 in West Germany, whereas in the United Kingdom, young adults born between 1974 and 1990 exhibited an increase in migration accompanied by a rise in repeat migration (Pelikh & Kulu, ). In an effort to systematise cohort analysis, Bernard () proposed a set of 10 measures that capture the level of completed migration, together with its distribution, progression and timing.…”