2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shore and non-block points in Hausdorff continua

Abstract: We study the shore and non-block points of non-metric continua. We reduce the problem of showing a continuum to have non-block points to that of showing an indecomposable continuum to have non-block points. As a corollary we prove that separable continua have at least two nonblock points-and moreover are irreducible about their set of non-block points.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Condition (1) shows that when D is a Q-point and f : ω → ω finite-to-one then f (D) is either principal or is a permutation of D. The next lemma proves our assertion that Q-points are the ≤-minimal ultrafilters.…”
Section: The Betweenness Structure Of H *mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Condition (1) shows that when D is a Q-point and f : ω → ω finite-to-one then f (D) is either principal or is a permutation of D. The next lemma proves our assertion that Q-points are the ≤-minimal ultrafilters.…”
Section: The Betweenness Structure Of H *mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Theorem 5.1 says that a metrizable continuum is not only coastal at each of its points, but coastal at each of its proper subcontinua (in the obvious broader sense). In the interests of extending this result to all continua, the following "reduction" theorem is an immediate consequence of the techniques developed in, 1 and is a minor improvement on [ We prove the following as we did Proposition 4.1.…”
Section: Theorem 51mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To close the section we remark that metrisability cannot be droped from the hypothesis of Lemma 5.2. Example 5.8 of [1] is the closed unit ball in the Hilbert space ℓ 2 (ω 1 ) of squaresummable functions ω 1 → R under the weak topology. In fact ℓ 2 (ω 1 ) is even a continuum and the elements of the ω 1 -chain are nowhere dense subcontinua.…”
Section: Separability and Metrisabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%