2017
DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2016.1274773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shopping, social inclusion and the urban geographies of people with intellectual disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, our paper contributes a new perspective to geographers' ongoing interest in questions surrounding the self-determination of people with disability. Complementing geographers' interest in people with cognitive disabilities' negotiation of everyday spaces as a key feature of their self-determination (Hall, 2005;Holt, 2007;Power & Bartlett, 2018;Wiesel & Bigby, 2016;Wilton et al, 2018), our paper highlights the significant but often overlooked temporalities of self-determination. Our analysis points to the need for careful geographical engagement with the complexity of decision-making by people with cognitive disability, acknowledging the elusive lines that often separate 'support' from 'substitution' of decision-making.…”
Section: Time Boundaries and The Labour Of Support For Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, our paper contributes a new perspective to geographers' ongoing interest in questions surrounding the self-determination of people with disability. Complementing geographers' interest in people with cognitive disabilities' negotiation of everyday spaces as a key feature of their self-determination (Hall, 2005;Holt, 2007;Power & Bartlett, 2018;Wiesel & Bigby, 2016;Wilton et al, 2018), our paper highlights the significant but often overlooked temporalities of self-determination. Our analysis points to the need for careful geographical engagement with the complexity of decision-making by people with cognitive disability, acknowledging the elusive lines that often separate 'support' from 'substitution' of decision-making.…”
Section: Time Boundaries and The Labour Of Support For Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In geographical scholarship there has been a long engagement with the sociocultural dimensions of decision-making by people with cognitive disability. Geographical analysis has focused more broadly on issues surrounding the selfdetermination of people with cognitive disability, through analyses of their agency in 'self-building' spaces (Power & Bartlett, 2018); participation in art (Macpherson et al, 2016), peer-support and self-advocacy (Power et al, 2016); the negotiation of everyday spaces (Hall, 2005;Holt, 2007;Power & Bartlett, 2018;Wiesel & Bigby, 2016;Wilton et al, 2018); and the co-production of knowledge (Holt et al, 2019;Murray, 2019). Despite geographers' ongoing interest in questions surrounding the self-determination of people with cognitive disability, explicit and direct links to supported decision-making have rarely, if ever, been drawn.…”
Section: The Socio-cultural Frontmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking photos of the places, activities and/or people they engaged with, collaborators labelled/with disabilities’ use of the tablet offered a different entry point into meaning (Rose, ), simultaneously capturing the material features of the urban environment and the subjective life‐world through the selection, focus and framing of images. This combination reveals “context” and “content” – helping us identify important spatial dimensions of how collaborators labelled/with disabilities experience the city (Wilton et al., ). Collecting information in multiple ways facilitates alternative routes of expression and presentation of information (Booth & Booth, ) – supporting access (essential for co‐production with disabled people).…”
Section: The My Life In the City Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La participación en actividades deportivas ha mostrado varios efectos positivos en personas con DI (Bowers et al, 2016; Crawford, Burns y Fernie, 2015; Pérez-Cruzado y Cuesta-Vargas, 2016). Las visitas con apoyo a centros comerciales contribuyen a satisfacer necesidades de las personas con DI (Wilton et al, 2018). Las personas con DI valoran el empleo como una fuente de ocupación, satisfacción y establecimiento de relaciones sociales y amistades (Iriarte, O'Brien, McConkey, Wolfe y O'Doherty, 2014).…”
Section: Inclusión Social: Participación Comunitariaunclassified