Shopping online? The role of imagination and gender

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine gender differences in the impact of imagining product use on purchase decisions. The authors argue that while imagination can enhance purchase intention for female consumers, it can be detrimental to male consumers. This study explores the conditions under which imagination can be turned into a positive device for male consumers. Design/methodology/approach Three experimental studies were conducted. The first two studies illustrate the differential effects of imagination on males vs females. Given the negative effect found among males, the third study focused exclusively on male consumers to identify conditions under which the negative impact of imagination on these consumers can be alleviated. Findings Studies 1 and 2 show that while an imagination tactic has positive or no effect on female consumers, a generic imagination request lowers male consumers’ purchase intention. Focusing on potential ways of alleviating this negative effect, Study 3 shows that for males without prior brand ownership experience, imagining product use in a less-typical context can increase purchase intention. Research limitations/implications The results provide evidence that gender impacts the effectiveness of imagination in improving product evaluation. Furthermore, the context of imagination and previous brand experience can be used together to determine how male consumers respond to imagination. Practical implications The study’s findings warn against the blind use of imagination tactics. Instead, retailers need to customize imagination tactics based on gender, previous brand experience and product usage context. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first papers to examine the impact of gender on the influence of imagination on product evaluation.

Exploring Online and In-Store Purchase Willingness: Associations With the Big Five Personality Traits, Trust, and Need for Touch

“…A large sample of this retailer’s customers ( N = 1,208) were surveyed to examine the associations of the Big Five, trust, and NFT with willingness to purchase in-store and online. Since various studies have demonstrated that age (e.g., Hult et al, 2019 ; Dorie and Loranger, 2020 ), gender (e.g., Seock and Bailey, 2008 ; Hult et al, 2019 ; Mann and Liu-Thompkins, 2019 ), and education (e.g., Hult et al, 2019 ) can influence customers’ purchase behavior and retail channel-selection behavior, we control for these three customer demographics so as to rule out their effects. The novel contributions of this exploratory study are as follows:…”

Webcare as a signal: exhaustive-selective webcare strategy and brand evaluation

“…While realism was maintained with respect to the actual look, feel and the content, both the review portal and the hospitality service brand used were fictitious to control the influence of other factors. Fictitious brands have been used extensively in the consumer behavior and branding studies (Mann and Liu-Thompkins, 2019; Thompson and Hamilton, 2006; Villar et al , 2012) as they give researchers control over the environment, brand names, etc. and maximize the internal validity of the study (Lanseng and Olsen, 2012; Newmeyer and Ruth, 2020).…”

Online consumer shopping behaviour: A review and research agenda

“…Bhargave et al (2016); Ashraf et al (2014); Badrinarayanan et al (2012); C. use qualitative studies, which could be very useful to understand consumer psychology. Qualitative research will give a more accurate idea regarding online consumer shopping behaviour compared to a laboratory experiment or a structured questionnaire.…”

“…Product descriptions are usually not enough for assessment (J. Xu, Benbasat, & Cenfetelli, 2020; X. Xu, Wu, & Li, 2020). The latest technologies such as augmented reality and virtual 3D have addressed such limitations (Mann & Liu‐Thompkins, 2019).…”