1996
DOI: 10.1108/14635789610153461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shopping centres and house values: an empirical investigation

Abstract: Focuses on the effect of both proximity and size of shopping centres on surrounding residential property values, using hedonic modelling. States that the data bank consists of a subset of some 4,000 single‐detached, owner‐occupied housing units transacted all over the Quebec Urban Community territory between January 1990 and December 1991. Tests several functional forms and uses up to 60 descriptors. Reveals that in line with previous studies, findings indicate that shopping‐centre size exerts a positive contr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
89
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, for variations of the variable ∆R below 100%, i.e., for the situations where the unit housing rents are at most doubled from 2011 to 2015, the changes in unit housing prices appear rather modest (maximum increase equal to 14.38%), whereas the variable ∆Y exponentially grows (up to +276%) for variations of the variable ∆R between 100% and 180%. This functional relationship exalts the role of the variable unit housing rent as a proxy for infrastructure facilities and services that concern with the locational characteristics of the municipalities in the sample being investigated, factors that, as noted in the reference literature, are the main determinants of the unit housing prices [58][59][60][61][62][63].…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for variations of the variable ∆R below 100%, i.e., for the situations where the unit housing rents are at most doubled from 2011 to 2015, the changes in unit housing prices appear rather modest (maximum increase equal to 14.38%), whereas the variable ∆Y exponentially grows (up to +276%) for variations of the variable ∆R between 100% and 180%. This functional relationship exalts the role of the variable unit housing rent as a proxy for infrastructure facilities and services that concern with the locational characteristics of the municipalities in the sample being investigated, factors that, as noted in the reference literature, are the main determinants of the unit housing prices [58][59][60][61][62][63].…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies show a significant positive correlation between the three major factors characterizing the residential area's socioeconomic level -income, education and employment -and the price of dwellings (Heikkila 1992;Potepan 1996;Goodman and Thibodeau 1998;Greenberg 1999;Des Rosiers et al 2002;Yates 2002). Income is considered the primary factor (Ozanne and Thibodeau 1983;Malpezzi et al 1998).…”
Section: Dwelling Price In Light Of Socioeconomic Level Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to model the impact of landscape quality on house prices are even less numerous (Li and Brown, 1980;Des Rosiers, Thérault, Kestens and Villeneuve, 2002). Bourassa, Hoesli and Sun (2003) introduced indicators to reflect the panoramic view over expanses of water for conurbations of the city of Auckland, New Zealand, as well as a series of variables measuring the average landscape and building quality in the neighbourhood.…”
Section: Landscape Quality and Hedonic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%