1984
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shoot and Root Growth of Lettuce Seedlings Following Root Pruning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) increased for roots in response to root excision, whereas it decreased slightly for shoots; but this decrease was only clearly apparent at the two most severe cutting levels. This behaviour, which agrees with previous reports (Humphries, 1958;Buttrose and Mullins, 1968;Richards and Rowe, 1977a;Biddington and Dearman, 1984), was observed whatever the initial plant weight. During the following time course, both specific growth rates approximately regained the values observed before cutting (Figs 1 and 3 A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3) increased for roots in response to root excision, whereas it decreased slightly for shoots; but this decrease was only clearly apparent at the two most severe cutting levels. This behaviour, which agrees with previous reports (Humphries, 1958;Buttrose and Mullins, 1968;Richards and Rowe, 1977a;Biddington and Dearman, 1984), was observed whatever the initial plant weight. During the following time course, both specific growth rates approximately regained the values observed before cutting (Figs 1 and 3 A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…During vegetative growth preceding excision (measured accurately only at 25 °C), the root fraction decreased slightly with time, as usually observed under non-limiting growth conditions (Bray, 1963;Troughton, 1967;Caloin and Yu, 1984). Immediately after cutting, the percentage of roots increased and attained a maximum close to its initial value (Brouwer, 1962;Biddington and Dearman, 1984). This maximum should indicate the end of the perturbed phase since, in the growth which followed, the root fraction again exhibited the decrease characteristic of unperturbed vegetative growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Western Europe, field-grown lettuce crops are established from transplants raised in compact peat blocks in greenhouses; because seeds germinate faster and more uniformly in peat blocks than in the field, transplanted crops are more competitive toward early weed infestation (Maltais et al, 2008) and provide a more uniform stand, thus facilitating crop scheduling (Cattivello and Danielis, 2008), reducing cropping time and allowing more plantings per year in the same field. However, transplanting induces a major stress in lettuce cultivation: lettuce seedlings in the optimal stage for transplanting (5–7 leaf stage) often suffer from mechanical root pruning (decapitation of the root tip; Biddington and Dearman, 1984) when seedlings are pulled out of the tray. The loss of root tips and root hairs due to root pruning at transplanting disturbs the root:shoot ratio and induces a “recovery phase” during which shoot growth is suppressed until the previous root:shoot ratio is restored (Bar-Tal et al, 1994a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reflects a relationship between the processes of growth and development of plant organs and suggests a mechanism that maintains a balance between shoot and root growth. Thus, after the excision of a considerable part of roots in various plant species, the growth of the root system was activated [3,4]; this process requires a redistribution of assimilates in favor of roots. It is still unknown how plants control biomass accumulation by their underground and aboveground organs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%