1995
DOI: 10.1089/end.1995.9.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shockwave Lithotripsy and Pacemakers: Experience with 20 Cases

Abstract: Lithotripsy treatment of urinary tract calculi initially excluded patients with cardiac pacemakers. Continued research and clinical study of patient outcomes has promoted a change in that initial concept. The Oklahoma Lithotripsy Center has successfully treated 20 patients with various types of pacemakers. No significant cardiovascular events occurred during treatment. Patients should be evaluated before the procedure by a cardiologist, and dual-chamber pacemakers should be reprogrammed to the single-chamber m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 However, other investigators found no evidence that pacemakers are damaged or reprogrammed by exposure to shockwaves. 15,16 These results are not relevant any more, as new lithotripters have a completely different technical standard. One reason for a lower likelihood of mechanical damage is that new-generation lithotripters use a cushion instead of the waterbath for coupling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…14 However, other investigators found no evidence that pacemakers are damaged or reprogrammed by exposure to shockwaves. 15,16 These results are not relevant any more, as new lithotripters have a completely different technical standard. One reason for a lower likelihood of mechanical damage is that new-generation lithotripters use a cushion instead of the waterbath for coupling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One device exhibited power-on-reset, one patient developed irregular heart rhythm if more than 22 kV was used, one device exhibited intermittent asynchronous operation, and one a 10beat/min increase in pacing rate with several extrasystoles. Albers et al 93 did not observe detrimental interactions in 20 pacemaker patients undergoing ESWL for urinary tract calculi. Safe ESWL has been reported in a patient with an abdominal contralateral early model ICD shielded with polyestyrene foam 94 and in a patient with an unshielded tiered-therapy ICD ipsilateral to the renal stone.…”
Section: Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is no documented relationship between the onset of arrhythmia and age, sex, cardiopathy, site, volume of the stone, onsite stent or nephrostomy, with or without anaesthesia, the number of shock waves, and the type of lithotripter [36]. Even those patients with pace makers may undergo an SWL with necessary precautions and cardiological supervision [37]. Although clinical and experimental data indicates that patients with aortic or renal aneurisms may be treated successfully, literature has reported some cases of breakage after an SWL [38].…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%