11th Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1973
DOI: 10.2514/6.1973-237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shockwave-boundary layer interference heating analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak heating rates for laminar, turbulent, and transitional shock impingement regions have been correlated by Hung and Barnett [4]. It was found that when 𝑅𝑒 𝐿 > 5 • 10 5 the boundary layer flow is sufficiently disturbed that SWBLI disturbance promotes transition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peak heating rates for laminar, turbulent, and transitional shock impingement regions have been correlated by Hung and Barnett [4]. It was found that when 𝑅𝑒 𝐿 > 5 • 10 5 the boundary layer flow is sufficiently disturbed that SWBLI disturbance promotes transition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…incident shock causes the boundary layer to separate and rapidly transition to turbulence [2]. Hypersonic transitional SWBLIs can result in significantly greater peak surface heat transfer than laminar or turbulent interactions [3][4][5][6] and are a phenomenon of great interest, especially for the outer surfaces of hypersonic cruise vehicles where in many cases the boundary layer is laminar up to the shock interaction. This is a particular concern for hypersonic cruise vehicles wherein the actuation of control surfaces may lead to an SWBLI interaction, triggering transition or even boundary layer separation and leading to very high off-design thermal and pressure loads.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, q w,max /q w,0 is the ratio between the maximum heat transfer and the upstream boundary layer, and p max / p ∞ is the pressure ratio across the shock wave. The value n was determined as 0.85 or 0.80 for turbulent boundary layers (Back & Cuffel 1970;Hung & Barnett 1973;Hankey & Holden 1975), and 0.70 for laminar boundary layers (Hankey & Holden 1975). While the n values from the literature were based on the separation of either fully laminar or turbulent boundary layers, the present investigation showed an upstream laminar boundary layer transitioning to turbulence by the shock impingement.…”
Section: Mean Surface Properties Of the 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal protection design requires the severe peak heat flux in the reattachment region of separation states. There are several methods for predicting the peak heat flux 1,2,[27][28][29][42][43][44] , and the peak heat flux is generally correlated with peak pressure rise in these methods. One simple correlation is expressed in the following form 28,29…”
Section: A Wall Shear Stress In the Reversed-flow Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak heat flux in the reattachment region is an important feature of separated flow. Most empirical methods to predict the peak heat flux always correlate it with peak pressure rise 1,2,[27][28][29] . Studies on wall pressure distributions are abundant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%