High-Pressure Shock Compression of Solids IV 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2292-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock Loading of Porous High Explosives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This adds a small amount of uncertainty to the density. Density measured in this way is 1.80 ± 0.01 g/cm 3 which agrees well with pycnometer readings of smaller samples [2].The amount of uncertainty was intentionally over-estimated.…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This adds a small amount of uncertainty to the density. Density measured in this way is 1.80 ± 0.01 g/cm 3 which agrees well with pycnometer readings of smaller samples [2].The amount of uncertainty was intentionally over-estimated.…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However at pressures below ~1.4 GPa the linear U p -U s relationship no longer holds. HPP contains ~1% voids; therefore we believe this non linear behavior is due to the crush out of voids, where as little as 1% void fraction is needed to alter material behavior at low pressure regimes [3]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the ORVIS and VISAR wave profiles in this case exhibit significantly longer rise times as well as generally higher amplitude oscillations. The general trend of longer rise times for coarser samples has been previously observed in magnetic gauge studies of shock-loaded sugar and HMX [22] The increased sample heterogeneity arising from grain fracturing during pressing may also contribute to the dispersive nature of the coarser sample. An expanded data base of results on samples with tailored particle size distributions should provide insight into the properties driving dispersive behavior and provide informative tests of the accuracy of mesoscopic scale numerical simulations.…”
Section: Preliminary Results With Tailored Particle Size Distributsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Fig 22). The observed rise time of the diffuse wave is 150-200 ns, slightly faster than that reported by Sheffield et al [22] In contrast to results from the sugar experiments, the 3-D plot in Fig. 29 also displays a slow but systematic increase in velocity subsequent to the initial ramp.…”
Section: Preliminary Experiments On Low-density Hmxcontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation