2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock in the cardiac intensive care unit: Changes in epidemiology and prognosis over time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
71
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Shock is increasingly prevalent in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) and remains associated with substantial mortality. 1 , 2 , 3 Although cardiogenic shock (CS) predominates in the CICU, patients with concomitant sepsis or mixed cardiogenic-vasodilatory shock account for 15% to 20% of CICU patients with shock and have worse outcomes. 1 , 2 , 4 The severity of shock is an important predictor of mortality in CICU patients and in patients with sepsis, providing incremental risk stratification on top of standard severity of illness risk scores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shock is increasingly prevalent in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) and remains associated with substantial mortality. 1 , 2 , 3 Although cardiogenic shock (CS) predominates in the CICU, patients with concomitant sepsis or mixed cardiogenic-vasodilatory shock account for 15% to 20% of CICU patients with shock and have worse outcomes. 1 , 2 , 4 The severity of shock is an important predictor of mortality in CICU patients and in patients with sepsis, providing incremental risk stratification on top of standard severity of illness risk scores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 2 , 3 Although cardiogenic shock (CS) predominates in the CICU, patients with concomitant sepsis or mixed cardiogenic-vasodilatory shock account for 15% to 20% of CICU patients with shock and have worse outcomes. 1 , 2 , 4 The severity of shock is an important predictor of mortality in CICU patients and in patients with sepsis, providing incremental risk stratification on top of standard severity of illness risk scores. 5 , 6 Shock severity can be quantified using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) cardiovascular subscore 5 , 7 , 8 or the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock classification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIRS results in a vasodilatory state (including arteries and veins) and can worsen cardiac function that further complicate management and has a negative impact on prognosis. In addition, over time with persistent neurohormonal activation, inflammation and hemodynamic forces, ventricular remodeling ensues (6), which underlies the development and progression of heart failure.…”
Section: Initial Evaluation Of Cardiogenic Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demographics, vital signs, laboratory results, diagnoses, procedures, therapies and length of stay (LOS) were extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) through the Multidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care Data Mart [18,19]. Admission diagnoses were defined as all International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes recorded within one day before or after CICU admission [20,21]. EMR data during the first 24 hours of CICU admission were used to automatically calculate the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-III scores and APACHE-IV predicted mortality via imputation of missing variables as normal [15][16][17][22][23][24].…”
Section: Collected Datamentioning
confidence: 99%