2011
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock Breakout in Type Ii Plateau Supernovae: Prospects for High-Redshift Supernova Surveys

Abstract: Shock breakout is the brightest radiative phenomenon in a supernova (SN) but is difficult to be observed owing to the short duration and X-ray/ultraviolet (UV)-peaked spectra. After the first observation from the rising phase reported in 2008, its observability at high redshift is attracting enormous attention. We perform multigroup radiation hydrodynamics calculations of explosions for evolutionary presupernova models with various main-sequence masses M MS , metallicities Z, and explosion energies E. We prese… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
6
96
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our simulations assume that the ions and electrons are strongly coupled, leading to only mild deviations between the matter and radiation temperatures. As such, we do not expect, and our simulations do not produce, a strong spike in the matter temperature at the front of the shock, in agreement with many recent results (Tominaga et al 2011;Moriya et al 2013;Tolstov et al 2013). Since Ensman & Burrows (1992) also assume electron/ion coupling, one would not expect a spike in temperature in their simulations either.…”
Section: Blast Profiles Light Curves and Spectrasupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our simulations assume that the ions and electrons are strongly coupled, leading to only mild deviations between the matter and radiation temperatures. As such, we do not expect, and our simulations do not produce, a strong spike in the matter temperature at the front of the shock, in agreement with many recent results (Tominaga et al 2011;Moriya et al 2013;Tolstov et al 2013). Since Ensman & Burrows (1992) also assume electron/ion coupling, one would not expect a spike in temperature in their simulations either.…”
Section: Blast Profiles Light Curves and Spectrasupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We show the evolution of the z40G and u40G spectra in Figure 6 (compare to Figure 2 in Tominaga et al 2011). Unlike with much more energetic Pop III PI SNe, the outer regions of the ejecta and the envelope are never fully ionized so bound-bound and bound-free transitions absorb most of the flux at the short wavelength limit of the spectrum.…”
Section: Light Curves/spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But these rough estimates suggest that the plateau phase for Z12 and Z60 would not be visible at z 5. The shock breakout transient is much brighter but is primarily composed of X-rays and hard UV that would mostly be absorbed by the neutral IGM at z 6 (Tominaga et al 2011). …”
Section: Sn Luminositiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future pencil beam surveys targeting high-redshift SNe should thus be aimed at regions with good spectral and multiwavelength coverage. We found the cadence of the search to be more or less optimal, given the constraint on total observational time, but with more frequent observations it should be possible to detect the UV breakout phase of core collapse SNe as well (e.g., Tominaga et al 2011). Observations in more than one filter is mandatory to be able to do photometric typing, but we also found it to be quite important for rejecting spurious objects in the detection step.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%