46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-7066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock/Boundary Layer/Heat Release Interaction in the HyShot II Scramjet Combustor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the flight tests and experiments (emulated by the simulation) the approach flow encounters a 17° inclined ramp, compressing the approach flow, and after bleeding off the ramp boundary layer, the resulting flow enters the isolator. Cesare et al, [71], use combustor inflow conditions from Won et al, [142], including also the ramp intake in their two-dimensional simulations. Fureby et al, [138][139], use results from three-dimensional RANS computations by Karl, [132,136], as inflow conditions whereas Larsson, [50], use perturbed RANS predictions as inlet conditions at a more upstream location compared to [132,136].…”
Section: Vid the Hyshot II Combustormentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the flight tests and experiments (emulated by the simulation) the approach flow encounters a 17° inclined ramp, compressing the approach flow, and after bleeding off the ramp boundary layer, the resulting flow enters the isolator. Cesare et al, [71], use combustor inflow conditions from Won et al, [142], including also the ramp intake in their two-dimensional simulations. Fureby et al, [138][139], use results from three-dimensional RANS computations by Karl, [132,136], as inflow conditions whereas Larsson, [50], use perturbed RANS predictions as inlet conditions at a more upstream location compared to [132,136].…”
Section: Vid the Hyshot II Combustormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fureby et al, [138][139], use results from three-dimensional RANS computations by Karl, [132,136], as inflow conditions whereas Larsson, [50], use perturbed RANS predictions as inlet conditions at a more upstream location compared to [132,136]. Cesare et al, [71], include the full combustor width and all four injectors in their simulation, using 14, 52 and 71 million cells, the FM subgrid flow model and the LES-FFM combustion model using the 1-step reaction mechanism of Marinov et al, [92]. Cesare et al, [71], employ a finite difference based code based on a WENO scheme and a TVD based Runge Kutta time integration algorithm.…”
Section: Vid the Hyshot II Combustormentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations