2011
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2010.2071879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ship Surveillance With TerraSAR-X

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
200
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 393 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
200
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its mean µ water and standard deviation σ water are estimated from pixel values in a sliding window, which is hollow square shaped (Figure 2). Then, the threshold is calculated with the equation The CFAR detector has proven its usefulness already for ship detection (Scharf, 1991;Vachon, 1997;Brusch, 2011) and later has been applied to iceberg detection (Gill, 2001;Power, 2001). In (Buus-Hinkler, 2014), an adapted CFAR detector is utilized for detailed studies on iceberg frequency in Greenland waters.…”
Section: Iceberg Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its mean µ water and standard deviation σ water are estimated from pixel values in a sliding window, which is hollow square shaped (Figure 2). Then, the threshold is calculated with the equation The CFAR detector has proven its usefulness already for ship detection (Scharf, 1991;Vachon, 1997;Brusch, 2011) and later has been applied to iceberg detection (Gill, 2001;Power, 2001). In (Buus-Hinkler, 2014), an adapted CFAR detector is utilized for detailed studies on iceberg frequency in Greenland waters.…”
Section: Iceberg Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is often applicable since the central limit theorem states that the average of a large number of identically distributed random variables tends to have a Gaussian distribution; obviously the more independent scatterers are in a resolution cell the more adequate the Gaussian model is. With this model it is possible to obtain a closed form for CFAR ship-detection algorithms with a computational saving compared to others methods adopting different distributions [5]. But the spatial resolution is tremendously improved in modern high resolution SARs and, consequently, the number of independent scatterers in the resolution cell is decreasing.…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold has to be chosen according to the image resolution: the higher the resolution, the larger the threshold value has to be set. In the second step, the azimuth ambiguities, due to the side lobes of the azimuth antenna pattern, are removed by evaluating the relative distance between the target and the replica as performed in [5] (ambiguities removal). It is possible to evaluate the azimuth displacement between the target and the first order ambiguities considering the equation (2).…”
Section: Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provided results, though extensive and meaningful, were limited to RADARSAT, ASAR and ERS images. Only lately, Brusch et al (2011) have published a ship detection chain for TerraSAR-X images where they briefly showed the validation of ship length estimation from 'Stripmap MGD' very high-resolution (3.3 m) products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%