2017
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2017.2664118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ship Detection From Optical Satellite Images Based on Saliency Segmentation and Structure-LBP Feature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A relatively large fraction of the authors (35%) used Google Earth images as the direct input data source in their research on vessel detection – either as exported data or simply as a print screen –, or as a source for collecting the greater amount of test data for machine learning methods (An et al, 2013, p. 201; Deng et al, 2013, Dong et al, 2013, Gan et al, 2015, Guo et al, 2015, Han et al, 2014, Hong et al, 2007, Huang et al, 2016, Johansson, 2011, Ju, 2015, Ma et al, 2010, p. 201; Shi et al, 2014, Xu et al, 2017, Xu et al, 2011, p. 201; Xu and Liu, 2016, Xu et al, 2014, Yang et al, 2017, Yang et al, 2014, You and Li, 2011, Zhang et al, 2016, Zou and Shi, 2016). One author has used data from Microsoft Virtual Earth (Yin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A relatively large fraction of the authors (35%) used Google Earth images as the direct input data source in their research on vessel detection – either as exported data or simply as a print screen –, or as a source for collecting the greater amount of test data for machine learning methods (An et al, 2013, p. 201; Deng et al, 2013, Dong et al, 2013, Gan et al, 2015, Guo et al, 2015, Han et al, 2014, Hong et al, 2007, Huang et al, 2016, Johansson, 2011, Ju, 2015, Ma et al, 2010, p. 201; Shi et al, 2014, Xu et al, 2017, Xu et al, 2011, p. 201; Xu and Liu, 2016, Xu et al, 2014, Yang et al, 2017, Yang et al, 2014, You and Li, 2011, Zhang et al, 2016, Zou and Shi, 2016). One author has used data from Microsoft Virtual Earth (Yin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al2016Google Earthn/a0.12, 0.25n/aDeep learning method: ship proposal extraction convolution neural networksyesVessel detectionR. Zhang et al2016GaoFen-1, VRRS-1, Google EarthPAN2 (GF-1), 16 (VRSS-1)20 pixelsDeep learning method: convolutional neural network, Singular value decomposition algorithmDiscrimination: SVM classifieryesVessel detectionZou and Shi2017Google Earthn/an/aComputer vision method: rotation and scale-invariant method based on the pose consistency votingyesInshore vessel detectionHe et al2017Google EarthPAN2n/aSalient-based method: maximum symmetric surround method, cellular automata dynamic evolution model, Otsu algorithmDiscrimination: histogram of oriented gradient, AdaBoost classifieryesVessel detectionWang et al2017Google EarthB, G, R10 pixelsSalient-based method: combined saliency map model through a self-adaptive threshold based on Entropy informationDiscrimination: based on gradient featuresyesVessel detectionXu et al2017Google EarthPAN2n/aSalient-based method: Histogram-based contrast method, phase spectrum of a Fourier transform, surface regular indexDiscrimination: Simple shape analysis, structure-local binary pattern, AdaBoost algorithmyesVessel detectionYang et al…”
Section: Inventory Of Evaluated Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of our method. To verify that the proposed method had a positive impact on ship detection, we compared our method with the state-of-the-art methods proposed in References [17,18] on Recall and Precision. These experiments were conducted on 290 images of the different situations above-mentioned, including the quiet sea, textured sea, and cluttered sea.…”
Section: Contrastive Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments were conducted on 290 images of the different situations above-mentioned, including the quiet sea, textured sea, and cluttered sea. The Recall and Precision of the method used in Reference [17] were 87.65% and 80.47%, respectively, while the Recall and Precision of the method in Reference [18] were 80.08% and 78.92%, respectively. In contrast, our method achieved a detection effect with higher accuracy.…”
Section: Contrastive Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation