Shining a Light on Diversity in Team Science*

Chen, Jen-Ting; Qadir, Nida; Hope, Aluko A.; Gershengorn, Hayley B.

doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005292

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

(24 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the same time, striking racial and ethnic health disparities laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted the health professions to take a hard look inwards, igniting a wave of health disparities and equity research [1,2]. As the moral imperative to combat discriminatory practices becomes more and more clear, the benefits of diversity and inclusion are also becoming increasingly obvious, with team science research highlighting the fact that diverse teams, working in inclusive and equitable environments, produce better science [3][4][5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Time to act: A rubric-based approach for institutionalizing justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion

Norman,

Radomski,

Proulx

et al. 2023

J. Clin. Trans. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Attacks on minoritized communities and increasing awareness of the societal causes of health disparities have combined to highlight deep systemic inequities. In response, academic health centers have prioritized justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) in their strategic goals. To have a sustained impact, JEDI efforts cannot be siloed; rather, they must be woven into the fabric of our work and systematically assessed to promote meaningful outcomes and accountability. To this end, the University of Pittsburgh’s Institute for Clinical Research Education assembled a task force to create and apply a rubric to identify short and long-term JEDI goals, assess the current state of JEDI at our Institute, and make recommendations for immediate action. To ensure deep buy-in, we gathered input from diverse members of our academic community, who served on targeted subcommittees. We then applied a three-step process to ensure rapid forward progress. We emerged with concrete actions for priority focus and a plan for ongoing assessment of JEDI institutionalization. We believe our process and rubric offer a scalable and adaptable model for other institutions and departments to follow as we work together across academic medical institutions to put our justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion goals into meaningful action.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Time to act: A rubric-based approach for institutionalizing justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion

Norman,

Radomski,

Proulx

et al. 2023

J. Clin. Trans. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Learning to make a difference for chILD: Value creation through network collaboration and team science

McKnight

Schultz

Vidic

et al. 2023

Pediatric Pulmonology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Addressing the recognized challenges and inequalities in providing high quality healthcare for rare diseases such as children's interstitial lung disease (chILD) requires collaboration across institutional, geographical, discipline, and system boundaries. The Children's Interstitial Lung Disease Respiratory Network of Australia and New Zealand (chILDRANZ) is an example of a clinical network that brings together multidisciplinary health professionals for collaboration, peer learning, and advocacy with the goal of improving the diagnosis and management of this group of rare and ultra‐rare conditions. This narrative review explores the multifaceted benefits arising from social learning spaces within rare disease clinical networks by applying the value creation framework. The operation of the chILDRANZ network is used as an example across the framework to highlight how value is generated, realized, and transferred within such collaborative clinical and research networks. The community of practice formed in the chILDRANZ multidisciplinary meetings provides a strong example of social learning that engages with the uncertainty inherent in rare disease diagnosis and management and pays attention to generate new knowledge and best practice to make a difference for children and families living with chILD. This review underscores international calls for further investment in, and support of, collaborative clinical networks and virtual centers of excellence for rare disease.

show abstract

Shining a Light on Diversity in Team Science*

Cited by 2 publications

References 14 publications

Time to act: A rubric-based approach for institutionalizing justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion

Time to act: A rubric-based approach for institutionalizing justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion

Learning to make a difference for chILD: Value creation through network collaboration and team science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About