2015
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shiga toxins and stx phages: highly diverse entities

Abstract: Shiga toxins are the main virulence factors of a group of Escherichia coli strains [Shiga toxinproducing E. coli (STEC)] that cause severe human diseases, such as haemorrhagic colitis and haemolytic-uraemic syndrome. The Shiga toxin family comprises several toxin subtypes, which have been differentially related to clinical manifestations. In addition, the phages that carry the Shiga toxin genes (stx phages) are also diverse. These phages play an important role not only in the dissemination of Shiga toxin genes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
124
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
2
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of two DNA segments highly homologous to either O104:H4 or O157:H7 stx 2a -converting prophages suggests a role of recombination in the evolution of type II prophages. This is in agreement with the view of recombination as the most common genetic event contributing to the mosaic structure and thus to the high genetic diversity of EHEC stx -converting phages [38, 41].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of two DNA segments highly homologous to either O104:H4 or O157:H7 stx 2a -converting prophages suggests a role of recombination in the evolution of type II prophages. This is in agreement with the view of recombination as the most common genetic event contributing to the mosaic structure and thus to the high genetic diversity of EHEC stx -converting phages [38, 41].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The stx genes are located in the genomes of lambdoid prophages ( stx- converting phages) which are very heterogeneous (reviewed in [41]). A recent report [38] demonstrated that stx 2a -converting prophages of EHEC O26 nEC strains were virtually identical with the stx 2a -prophages present in the highly virulent E. coli O104:H4 German outbreak strain [42], while other O26 lineages harbored different stx -converting prophages [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is possible that the CRISPR system may affect the level of the CI repressor in the cell, which leads to the induction of the prophage, this possibility was ruled out experimentally (Edgar and Qimron, 2010). Another possible explanation is that, in the case of Stx phage, the induction of Stx prophages has been shown to be controlled by the RecA -a regulator of the SOS bacterial response (Kruger and Lucchesi, 2015; Sheng et al, 2016). It has been shown that the interaction of the Type I-F CRISPR system with the phage protospacer induces expression of the SOS-regulated phage-related genes through the activity of the nuclease Cas3 and subsequent RecA activation (Heussler et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that Stx phage lysogenization of STEC promotes its pathogenicity and contributes to its viability in environmental conditions (Croxen et al, 2013). Stx2 production is reported to be associated with more severe diseases than strains that produce either Stx1 or a combination of Stx1 and Stx2 (Kleanthous et al, 1990; Pacheco and Sperandio, 2012; Kruger and Lucchesi, 2015). Clinically, the use of antibiotics to treat STEC infections has become controversial due to the stimulation of the lytic cycle and the concomitant toxin release through the bacterial SOS response (Croxen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the two-tiered serological test has good sensitivity in later LD, sensitivity is low in very early disease (i.e., at the EM stage), and up to 20% of patients may test negative in very early disseminated LD (25). To date, there have been no discoveries of specific determinants of pathogenicity or virulence factors of B. burgdorferi such as those represented by the toxin secretion and invasion-encoding pathogenicity islands of many other pathogenic bacteria (68,69,70), and it is thought that most of the pathogenic effects are due to local inflammation induced by the bacterium and effects of autoantibodies (71,72). The capacity of B. burgdorferi strains to systemically disseminate in humans has been considered equivalent to pathogenicity for this species complex (1,73).…”
Section: Ecological Origins and Clinical And Diagnostic Importance Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%