2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in food: Incidence, ecology, and detection strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Baker et al . ). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that non‐O157 STEC were responsible for 64% of the STEC infections (Scallan et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…; Baker et al . ). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that non‐O157 STEC were responsible for 64% of the STEC infections (Scallan et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Conventional methods, based on selective and differential media in combination with biochemical confirmation, have historically been widely utilized for E. coli detection but unfortunately these techniques have some limitations; requiring considerable time (4–7 days), extensive labour, and often exhibit low sensitivity and specificity (Baker et al . ,b). Over the past few decades, molecular techniques including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been employed for rapid and accurate detection of foodborne pathogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E.coli shows many different serotypes and of these serotypes, E.coli O157:H7 is a significant morbidity and mortality cause for human health. Bacteria enterohemolysin (hlyA) and cytotoxin known as shiga toxin are important virulence factors (5). Enterohemolysin is coded by hlyA and causes lysis of erythrocytes, contributes to virulence of microorganisms and thus provides iron sources to bacteria so that they can survive in the intestine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground beef is infamous for its frequent association with foodborne illness, and the microbial populations in ground beef have been more frequently investigated due to issues associated with foodborne illness concerns, particularly enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. [2][3][4][5][6] Several contributors to foodborne illness in ground beef products may also apply to ground pork products. However, conclusions about the effects of spoilage microorganisms on beef products cannot be assumed to apply to pork products due to differences in the physiological properties of these meat products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%