2015
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifts in subsistence type and its impact on the human skull's morphological integration

Abstract: The transition to softer diets increased morphological variation across cranial regions that are more exposed to masticatory strains effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The semilandmarks must be slid along a tangential direction so as to remove tangential variation because contours should be homologous from subject to subject, whereas their individual points need not be (Perez et al, ). Therefore, we projected an asterisk (Figure A) on each face of the centrum in order to allocate semilandmarks, following similar approaches to those published in Maddux and Franciscus () and Paschetta et al (). The projection was positioned so its center would coincide with the anatomical landmark on the center of the centrum face (Figure A, Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semilandmarks must be slid along a tangential direction so as to remove tangential variation because contours should be homologous from subject to subject, whereas their individual points need not be (Perez et al, ). Therefore, we projected an asterisk (Figure A) on each face of the centrum in order to allocate semilandmarks, following similar approaches to those published in Maddux and Franciscus () and Paschetta et al (). The projection was positioned so its center would coincide with the anatomical landmark on the center of the centrum face (Figure A, Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanically, the more food is pre-processed, the lower the masticatory effort required to break it down and the lower the forces experienced by the facial bones [30, 35, 36]. In general terms, reduced strain on bones would result in a reduction in bone growth and this has been proposed as a relevant factor in skull variation among populations, particularly in the lower portion of the face, with the rest of the bones being subject to the influence of other agents of variation [37, 38]. In the case of modern individuals, who eat a soft, mechanically less demanding diet, mandibular prognathism would result from an excessive growth of the condyle cartilage; this has been proposed to be a response to masticatory loads of an individual’s mandible, the interaction between genes and environmental factors, which can increase the predisposition to develop such malocclusions [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal changes in masticatory regions are well documented in human and nonhuman crania (Antón, ; Katz, Grote, & Weaver, ; Menegaz et al, ; Menéndez, Bernal, Novellino, & Perez, ; Noback & Harvati, ; Paschetta et al, ; Sardi, Novellino, & Pucciarelli, ). For instance, agriculturalists exhibit more inferiorly located superior temporal line, taller palatal vault, narrower dental arch (palate), and less vertical zygomatic arch than in hunter‐gatherers (Katz et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%