1996
DOI: 10.2307/4002294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifts in Botanical Composition of Flatwoods Range following Fertilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). The decrease in native species and increase in non-native species following treatment application are consistent with previous findings in relation to grazing (Belsky 1992;Noy-Meir 1995;Biondini et al 1998), soil disturbance (Wilson and Tilman 1993;Chalmers 1996), soil fertiliser (Hobbs et al 1988;Wilson and Shay 1990;Willems et al 1993;Kalmbacher and Martin 1996;Lake and Leishman 2004) and fire (NoyMeir 1995;Orr et al 1997).…”
Section: Responses Of Plant Species Groupssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…2). The decrease in native species and increase in non-native species following treatment application are consistent with previous findings in relation to grazing (Belsky 1992;Noy-Meir 1995;Biondini et al 1998), soil disturbance (Wilson and Tilman 1993;Chalmers 1996), soil fertiliser (Hobbs et al 1988;Wilson and Shay 1990;Willems et al 1993;Kalmbacher and Martin 1996;Lake and Leishman 2004) and fire (NoyMeir 1995;Orr et al 1997).…”
Section: Responses Of Plant Species Groupssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This result suggests an increase in competitive interactions caused by the increase in availability of this nutrient (Grime, 1973). However, similar to the findings of Elisseou et al (1995) and Kalmbacher and Martin (1996), the addition of phosphorus alone did not change the vegetation diversity. It is, nevertheless, important to realize that changes in shoot number do not necessary lead to changes in biomass.…”
Section: Changes In Biodiversity and Species Richnesssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Accordingly, increases in N availability often increase weedy or invasive species dominance, decrease native, late-successional species growth, and reduce diversity (e.g., Kalmbacher and Martin 1996;Young et al 1997;Paschke et al 2000;Seabloom et al 2003;Suding et al 2005). Increases in N do not facilitate all invasions, however (e.g., Brandon et al 2004;Thomsen et al 2006); eVects of increased N on invasion depend on the nature of the invader, resident community, and ecosystem of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Species adapted to high resource availability tend to have higher relative growth rates than other species under high-nutrient conditions (Chapin 1980) but also tend to have high nutrient requirements, rapid tissue turnover, and high nutrient loss rates that limit their ability to compete with species adapted to low resource availability under low-nutrient conditions (Chapin 1980;Shipley and Keddy 1988;McLendon and Redente 1994). Thus, under high-nutrient conditions species adapted to high resource availability tend to dominate plant communities and suppress species adapted to low resource availability, while under low-nutrient conditions species adapted to low resource availability often dominate plant communities and suppress species adapted to high resource availability (Carson and Barrett 1988;McLendon and Redente 1992;Inouye and Tilman 1995;Kalmbacher and Martin 1996;Paschke et al 2000). Although some invasive, exotic species are adapted to low resource availability (e.g., Funk and Vitousek 2007) and some desired, native species are adapted to high resource availability (e.g., Stromberg et al 2007), invasive exotic species tend to be better adapted to high resource availability than most desired, native species, have high-resource traits compared to native species (Leishman et al 2007;Pysek and Richardson 2007) and are more successful in high-resource environments than native species (Daehler 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%