“…It may be that preferential adopters are more open with regard to certain aspects of their adopted child, but this openness does not extend to adopting an African American child. Indeed, they may be more open to adopting transracially, but feel that Black children are “too different” (Shiao et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…African Americans are often the recipients of the most negative stereotypes, being considered stupid and lazy (Lee & Bean). As Shiao, Tuan, and Rienzi (2004) pointed out, the United States “is moving beyond its historic hierarchy of Whites over non‐Whites to an emergent hierarchy of non‐Blacks over Blacks” (p. 2).…”
Section: Racial Hierarchies and Racial Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals who adopt from Asia may do so because they feel that Asian children are more assimilable to mainstream (White) culture than other minority race children (Ishizawa, Kenney, Kubo, & Stevens, 2006). Shiao et al (2004) studied White adoptive parents of Korean children and found that parents often chose to adopt from Korea because of their perception that Korean children were “exotic yet assimilable” and “baggage free … and saveable” in contrast to African American children, who were viewed by some parents as unadoptable owing to perceived “damage, irredeemability, and marginalization” (pp. 7–8).…”
Section: Racial Hierarchies and Racial Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may be encouraged by adoption workers to evaluate how supportive their family members are of their decision to adopt, and to consider how family might react if they adopted a different‐race child (Brodzinsky, 2008). Family nonsupport and racism represent major challenges faced by multiracial heterosexual (Shiao et al, 2004) and lesbian (Bennett, 2003) adoptive families, and can contribute to familial tensions. Consequently, perceived social network support for adoption was considered as a predictor of openness.…”
Section: Predictors Of Openness To Adopting An African American Childmentioning
Despite increases in transracial adoption, African American children remain the least likely to be adopted. No research has examined the factors that predict prospective adopters' willingness to adopt an African American child. This study used multilevel modeling to examine predictors of willingness to adopt an African American child in a sample of 48 lesbian couples and 65 heterosexual couples. Individuals pursuing public adoption were more willing than those pursuing private domestic adoption, and heterosexuals pursuing international adoption were more willing than heterosexuals pursuing private domestic adoption. In addition, younger persons, White persons (rather than non‐African American racial minorities), lesbians, and individuals who perceived their neighborhoods as more diverse were more likely to be willing to adopt an African American child.
“…It may be that preferential adopters are more open with regard to certain aspects of their adopted child, but this openness does not extend to adopting an African American child. Indeed, they may be more open to adopting transracially, but feel that Black children are “too different” (Shiao et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…African Americans are often the recipients of the most negative stereotypes, being considered stupid and lazy (Lee & Bean). As Shiao, Tuan, and Rienzi (2004) pointed out, the United States “is moving beyond its historic hierarchy of Whites over non‐Whites to an emergent hierarchy of non‐Blacks over Blacks” (p. 2).…”
Section: Racial Hierarchies and Racial Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals who adopt from Asia may do so because they feel that Asian children are more assimilable to mainstream (White) culture than other minority race children (Ishizawa, Kenney, Kubo, & Stevens, 2006). Shiao et al (2004) studied White adoptive parents of Korean children and found that parents often chose to adopt from Korea because of their perception that Korean children were “exotic yet assimilable” and “baggage free … and saveable” in contrast to African American children, who were viewed by some parents as unadoptable owing to perceived “damage, irredeemability, and marginalization” (pp. 7–8).…”
Section: Racial Hierarchies and Racial Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may be encouraged by adoption workers to evaluate how supportive their family members are of their decision to adopt, and to consider how family might react if they adopted a different‐race child (Brodzinsky, 2008). Family nonsupport and racism represent major challenges faced by multiracial heterosexual (Shiao et al, 2004) and lesbian (Bennett, 2003) adoptive families, and can contribute to familial tensions. Consequently, perceived social network support for adoption was considered as a predictor of openness.…”
Section: Predictors Of Openness To Adopting An African American Childmentioning
Despite increases in transracial adoption, African American children remain the least likely to be adopted. No research has examined the factors that predict prospective adopters' willingness to adopt an African American child. This study used multilevel modeling to examine predictors of willingness to adopt an African American child in a sample of 48 lesbian couples and 65 heterosexual couples. Individuals pursuing public adoption were more willing than those pursuing private domestic adoption, and heterosexuals pursuing international adoption were more willing than heterosexuals pursuing private domestic adoption. In addition, younger persons, White persons (rather than non‐African American racial minorities), lesbians, and individuals who perceived their neighborhoods as more diverse were more likely to be willing to adopt an African American child.
“…Contemporary research mirrors these findings about adoptive parents' colorblind ideologies. Studies find that although parents engage in colorblind practices with their transracially adopted children, they relied upon racist stereotypes to guide their adoption choices and the (un)desirability of certain adoptable children (Brian, ; Shiao, Tuan, & Rienzi, ). For example, white adoptive parents use racially coded language to describe Asian children as a “better fit” into their family than black children; they also frame Asian children as “baggage free” in comparison to black children (Kubo, ).…”
Despite nearly half a million transnational adoptions to the United States, most of which are also transracial, sociological research has given little attention to this phenomenon. This review demonstrates why more sociological attention on Korean transnational adoption in particular is warranted. I review one area with overwhelming sociological significance—identity formation, including the distinct dimensions of racial, ethnic, and adoptive identities. While the bulk of this research has taken place outside of sociology, in reviewing the findings, I argue the sociological significance of Korean transnational transracial adoption to examinations of race, racialization, and identity formation.
The 2010 earthquake in Haiti not only devastated the country's infrastructure, it also left many orphaned children, which accelerated the pace of international transracial adoptions by families in the United States and other developed countries. While international adoptees such as these Haitian children are older and will therefore likely remember some aspects of their birth culture, often younger children are at risk of forgetting much of their cultural and linguistic heritage. Despite much research on international transracial adoptions, surprisingly few web-based resources are available to adoptees for exploring and connecting with their birth cultures. To address this shortcoming, we used an iterative approach of ethnographic methods, paper prototypes, usability testing and heuristic evaluations to design Synergy, a system which allows adoptees to explore and connect with their birth cultures and its people autonomously.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.