2020
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting limitation of primary production: experimental support for a new model in lake ecosystems

Abstract: The limits on primary production vary in complex ways across space and time. Strong tests of clear conceptual models have been instrumental in understanding these patterns in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Here we present the first experimental test of a new model describing how shifts from nutrient to light limitation control primary productivity in lake ecosystems as hydrological inputs of nutrients and organic matter vary. We found support for two key predictions of the model: that gross primary p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5B). The unimodal DOC‐GPP relationship was recently described in empirical and modeling studies suggesting that DOC can promote GPP due to DOC‐associated nutrients or coupled nutrient‐DOC loading up to a threshold, after which DOC reduces GPP via light limitation (Zwart et al 2016; Kelly et al 2018; Olson et al 2020). Our boosted regression trees predicted that peak GPP occurred in lakes with 6–7 mg L −1 DOC, close to the 7–8 mg L −1 DOC peak predicted by Kelly et al’s (2018) model, and within the range of empirical estimates from arctic and boreal regions (Seekell et al 2015; Bergström and Karlsson 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5B). The unimodal DOC‐GPP relationship was recently described in empirical and modeling studies suggesting that DOC can promote GPP due to DOC‐associated nutrients or coupled nutrient‐DOC loading up to a threshold, after which DOC reduces GPP via light limitation (Zwart et al 2016; Kelly et al 2018; Olson et al 2020). Our boosted regression trees predicted that peak GPP occurred in lakes with 6–7 mg L −1 DOC, close to the 7–8 mg L −1 DOC peak predicted by Kelly et al’s (2018) model, and within the range of empirical estimates from arctic and boreal regions (Seekell et al 2015; Bergström and Karlsson 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While this past work has advanced our knowledge of lake organic matter processing, recent research has highlighted context‐dependency and nonlinearities between lake characteristics and GPP. One avenue of recent research has reimagined the paradigm that DOC negatively relates to GPP; researchers now propose a unimodal relationship where DOC‐associated nutrients can fertilize lakes at low DOC concentrations, before limiting GPP due to greater light attenuation at high DOC concentrations (Seekell et al 2015; Kelly et al 2018; Olson et al 2020). Another line of research suggests that GPP and nutrients may relate nonlinearly in hypereutrophic systems, where high nitrate can reduce chlorophyll concentration through nitrogen stress (Filstrup et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DOM composition influences both the primary production and respiration terms of ecosystem metabolism. Primary production in lakes is controlled not only by the magnitude of DOC loads, but also by their specific light absorptivity and nutrient:C stoichiometry (Bergstro ¨m and Karlsson 2019; Kelly et al 2018;Olson et al 2020). DOM composition also interacts with water residence time and lake thermal structure to control rates of ecosystem respiration (e.g., Berggren et al 2010;Jones et al 2018;Mostovaya et al 2016).…”
Section: The Dynamic Composition Of the Dom Pool Will Impact The Global C Cycle Of Inland Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By limiting photosynthesis, browning can decrease primary production, reducing the biomass available for higher trophic levels (Ask et al, 2009; Jones et al, 2012; Seekell et al, 2015; Vasconcelos et al, 2016). This negative impact on resource availability is especially strong for benthic systems (Karlsson et al, 2009; Vasconcelos et al, 2018), but can be positive, negative or neutral with respect to pelagic resource production (phytoplankton and zooplankton; Ask et al, 2012; van Dorst et al, 2020; Kelly et al, 2016; Leech et al, 2020; Olson et al, 2020; Vasconcelos et al, 2018). Not only may browning‐induced light limitation alter resource production and biomass, but also zooplankton prey community composition (van Dorst et al, 2020; Robidoux et al, 2015; Williamson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%