2016
DOI: 10.1112/s0025579316000218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifted Moments of ‐functions and Moments of Theta Functions

Abstract: Abstract. Assuming the Riemann Hypothesis, Soundararajan showed in [18] that

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of Theorem 1.6 is given in Section 2.5. Under the assumption of the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, Munsch [22] obtains the following upper bounds…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of Theorem 1.6 is given in Section 2.5. Under the assumption of the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, Munsch [22] obtains the following upper bounds…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As initiated in previous works [28–30, 32], we aim at similar results for moments of theta functions ϑ(x;χ) associated with Dirichlet characters, as defined by ϑfalse(x;χfalse)=n1χfalse(nfalse)normaleπn2x/pfalse(χXp+false),where Xp+ denotes the subgroup of order 12false(p1false) of even Dirichlet characters modulo p. It was conjectured by Louboutin [27] that ϑ(1;χ)0 for every nontrivial character modulo a prime — see [11] for a case of vanishing in the composite case.…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Lower bounds providing the expected order for the moments are obtained in [32]. Conditionally on Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, nearly optimal upper bounds are established in [30].…”
Section: Introduction and Statements Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the Generalised Riemann Hypothesis for Dirichlet L-functions, Munsch [16] proved almost sharp upper bounds for the 2k-th moment of theta functions θ(1, χ) as the character χ varies over non-principal Dirichlet characters mod q, for each fixed k ∈ N. He did this by writing θ(1, χ) as a Perron integral involving the L-function L(s, χ), and then expanding the 2k-th power and bounding the averages of products 2k j=1 |L(1/2 + it j , χ)| that emerge. This is interesting here because for even characters χ, θ(1, χ) behaves roughly like n≤ √ q χ(n), which is modelled by the sum n≤ √ q f (n) of a Steinhaus random multiplicative function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But for smaller q this kind of argument doesn't seem operable to prove sharp bounds, indeed one has already lost too much information in applying the triangle inequality to the Perron integral. Nevertheless, it might permit a relatively straightforward extension of Munsch's [16] results to non-integer k ≥ 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%