2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-019-03457-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifted Derived Poisson Manifolds Associated with Lie Pairs

Abstract: A. We study the shifted analogue of the "Lie-Poisson" construction for L∞ algebroids and we prove that any L∞ algebroid naturally gives rise to shifted derived Poisson manifolds. We also investigate derived Poisson structures from a purely algebraic perspective and, in particular, we establish a homotopy transfer theorem for derived Poisson algebras.As an application, we prove that, given a Lie pair (L, A), the space tot Ω • A (Λ • (L/A)) admits a degree (+1) derived Poisson algebra structure with the wedge pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The L ∞ -brackets {λ k } k≥5 vanish for similar reasons.It thus follows that the generating relations of the (−1)-shifted derived Poisson algebra structure on Ω • F (∧ • B), are exactly those of[2, Proposition 4.3]. This concludes the proof.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The L ∞ -brackets {λ k } k≥5 vanish for similar reasons.It thus follows that the generating relations of the (−1)-shifted derived Poisson algebra structure on Ω • F (∧ • B), are exactly those of[2, Proposition 4.3]. This concludes the proof.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…is a differential Gerstenhaber algebra, thus also a (−1)-shifted derived Poisson algebra [2], where [−, −] SN is the Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket. Op cit, a (−1)-shifted derived Poisson algebra structure is constructed on Γ(M, ∧ • F ∨ ⊗ ∧ • (T K M/F )).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that both (C • reg (E), d E ) and (C • (A E ), d CE ) are commutative dg algebras. It is natural to expect that this contraction is compatible with the relevant algebra structures, in other words, a semifull algebra contraction introduced by Real [40] (see also [4] for an equivalent definition). We will return to this problem in the future.…”
Section: It Is Clear That Kermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove the second statement of Theorem 4.4, we need the homological perturbation lemma (cf. [4]), which we recall as follows:…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%