2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2013.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shift from gross profit taxation to distributed profit taxation: Are there effects on firms?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in the next section, the evidence we provide is consistent with that presented by Arnold et al (2011) and Masso et al (2013). Arnold et al (2011) find evidence that, for European firms, higher corporate taxes slow productivity growth in more profitable industries.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed in the next section, the evidence we provide is consistent with that presented by Arnold et al (2011) and Masso et al (2013). Arnold et al (2011) find evidence that, for European firms, higher corporate taxes slow productivity growth in more profitable industries.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Arnold et al (2011) find evidence that, for European firms, higher corporate taxes slow productivity growth in more profitable industries. Masso et al (2013) find that, for Estonian firms, corporate tax cuts provoke a significant increase in investment spending, with the effect most pronounced among small firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar approach has been used by Masso et al (2013), who estimated the outcomes of the Estonian corporate tax reform with DID analysis using firms from the other two Baltic countries, Latvia and Lithuania, as the control group for Estonian firms. Compared to a within-country micro-econometric evaluation this approach has the advantage of identifying the effects from a comparison of whole populations not just subgroups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%