2007
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shielding design for a laser-accelerated proton therapy system

Abstract: In this paper, we present the shielding analysis to determine the necessary neutron and photon shielding for a laser-accelerated proton therapy system. Laser-accelerated protons coming out of a solid high-density target have broad energy and angular spectra leading to dose distributions that cannot be directly used for therapeutic applications. A special particle selection and collimation device is needed to generate desired proton beams for energy- and intensity-modulated proton therapy. A great number of unw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shielding design for a laser-accelerated proton therapy system has been assessed by Fan et al [74]. Monte Carlo simulations determined the shielding necessary for 300 MeV protons and 270 MeV electrons at a laser intensity of 2 × 10 21 W·cm −2 .…”
Section: Beam Transport and Delivery Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shielding design for a laser-accelerated proton therapy system has been assessed by Fan et al [74]. Monte Carlo simulations determined the shielding necessary for 300 MeV protons and 270 MeV electrons at a laser intensity of 2 × 10 21 W·cm −2 .…”
Section: Beam Transport and Delivery Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such proposed schemes were based on a compact beamline with a primary collimator in front of a magnetic chicane filter [19,48]. Due to the very small opening angle (0.6°) of the primary collimator, used to limit diverging LAP bunches, such beamline uses a mere of *0.02 % of all protons in a bunch for dose delivery [50], while depositing huge numbers of protons in beam dumps and producing a high level of secondary (background) radiations. Such collimator-based beamlines are highly inefficient [51] reducing the per bunch dose.…”
Section: Laser-driven Versus Conventional Ibt Dose Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7]) and novel concepts are being developed to overcome this limitation [8]. The assumed initial energy spectrum of the protons used here is very broad (with energies up to 300 MeV) and derived by extrapolating current experimental spectra to higher energies (as done in [9] and [8]). This is based on the target normal sheath acceleration (TNSA) mechanism [10] or other acceleration regimes that show broad energy spectra (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%