1992
DOI: 10.1016/0278-4165(92)90010-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shepherds and sediments: Geo-ethnoarchaeology of pastoral sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
114
0
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
114
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, sediment thin section micromorphology analyses of undisturbed samples supported by image analyses techniques has the potential to discriminate between different fuel ash residues in mixed sedimentary environments at the microscopic scale and is the technique applied in this study. Micromorphological indicators of fuel ash residues may include colour, indicative of iron immobilisation when heated [10]; charcoal material [12,38]; calcitic pseudomorph crystals [6,7]; and silica phytoliths and diatoms [10]. Such analyses of fuel residues have, in a range of environmental contexts, permitted distinctions to be made between wood sources, including burning temperature, and between grass, sedge and animal manure sources, suggesting that identification of fuel sources in an Icelandic landnám context may be possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, sediment thin section micromorphology analyses of undisturbed samples supported by image analyses techniques has the potential to discriminate between different fuel ash residues in mixed sedimentary environments at the microscopic scale and is the technique applied in this study. Micromorphological indicators of fuel ash residues may include colour, indicative of iron immobilisation when heated [10]; charcoal material [12,38]; calcitic pseudomorph crystals [6,7]; and silica phytoliths and diatoms [10]. Such analyses of fuel residues have, in a range of environmental contexts, permitted distinctions to be made between wood sources, including burning temperature, and between grass, sedge and animal manure sources, suggesting that identification of fuel sources in an Icelandic landnám context may be possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the more reliable means of identifying a dung signature in sediments is through the study of spherulites, fibrous crystalline aggregates of calcium carbonate from the guts of ungulates (Brochier et al 1992;Canti 1997Canti , 1999Shahack-Gross and Finkelstein 2008;Lancelotti and Madella 2012). Studies of spherulites can provide a direct indication of dung, and they have been identified at the early farming site of Jeitun in Turkmenistan (Canti 1997).…”
Section: The Archaeology Of Dungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reworking of older deposits appears to have been a primary process in the formation of the Neolithic layers in Edera (Boschian and Montagnari Kokelj 2000). This discontinuity also marks a completely different use of caves: from gatherings of people in the Mesolithic, to animal shelters or sheep pens in the Neolithic, which is a well-known pattern in caves and rockshelters throughout the Mediterranean (Brochier et al 1992; see also Boschian and Montagnari Kokelj 2000). This could explain the presence of Late Mesolithic Castelnovian microliths in Neolithic deposits in the Triestine karst caves (Montagnari Kokelj 1993) and the presence of anomalous radiocarbon dates and inversions in radiocarbon sequences.…”
Section: Continuity or Gap?mentioning
confidence: 97%