1980
DOI: 10.1093/ee/9.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shelterbelts and Boll Weevils 1 : a Control Strategy Based on Management of Overwintering Habitat 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also showed potential for detecting weevils leaving the field to refuge areas during the harvesting and stalk-destruction. Boll weevil usually leaves cotton fields to nearby areas using them as refuge during the intercropping periods (Rummel and Adkisson, 1970;Slosser and Boring, 1980), possibly, the same place where they will come from at the beginning of the next season. Thus, by knowing the refuge sites, the number of GGTs installed can be maximized near these areas when approaching the planting date for a better knowledge of the weevil population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also showed potential for detecting weevils leaving the field to refuge areas during the harvesting and stalk-destruction. Boll weevil usually leaves cotton fields to nearby areas using them as refuge during the intercropping periods (Rummel and Adkisson, 1970;Slosser and Boring, 1980), possibly, the same place where they will come from at the beginning of the next season. Thus, by knowing the refuge sites, the number of GGTs installed can be maximized near these areas when approaching the planting date for a better knowledge of the weevil population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the season, when stalk destruction is mandatory, adult boll weevils leave the cotton field, moving to surrounding crop fields and native vegetation (Rummel and Adkisson, 1970;Slosser and Boring, 1980;Showler, 2006;Ribeiro et al, 2010). This dispersal activity not only assembles an adult population in the refuge area that may survive the intercropping period, but it may also explain the high capture of weevils in tubes and traps at the season end during harvesting and stalk destruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the relatively good tolerance of diapausing weevils to low winter temperatures (Kostal & Simek, 1996), suitable shelters are indispensable to avoid desiccation and/or freezing during the aestivohibernation period. As in C. nenuphar (Lafleur et al, 1987), and A. grandis (Slosser & Boring, 1980), the litter of dry leaves on the ground is the most important microhabitat for overwintering in A. pomorum (Korchagin, 1978;Tret'yakov, 1991). However, some weevils could also be found under the rough bark of different tree species, such as Malus sp., Pyrus sp., Cerasus sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardwood litter was more conducive to overwintering success than conifer litter. Similarly, the boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis) successfully overwintered in hardwood litter but not in conifer litter (Bottrell et al, 1972;Slosser and Boring, 1980). Shelterbelts contribute to improved soil moisture relationships within the crop field protected by the shelterbelt in two ways: (1) reductions in wind speed reduce evaporation from the soil surface, leaving more water for crop development and (2) low-density field shelterbelts create a broad zone of increased snow deposition across the field on the leeward side of a shelterbelt, leading to an increase in available soil moisture (Kort, 1988;Scholten, 1988).…”
Section: Functional Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predators, including humans, recognize the advantages of hunting along a shelterbelt (Cable and Cook, 1990). Predatorprey relationships of crop pests and natural predators may be influenced, positively or negatively, by the availability of overwintering habitat (Slosser and Boring, 1980). Control of wind and water erosion by systems of shelterbelts has far reaching consequences on the offsite costs associated with erosion, including air and water quality, which impact human health (Huszar and Piper, 1986;Williams and Young, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%