1970
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.2.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shell-Model Structure ofCa4250

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the former issue, although microscopic theories of effective interaction have been developed over decades, some empirical corrections are still needed for describing a wide range of nuclei belonging to a given shell. In particular, the monopole components of effective interactions-the parts responsible for the evolution of the shell structureare known to be subject to modification [2,3,5]. This so-called shell evolution plays a decisive role in the structure of exotic nuclei, and has been attracting much interest in this field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the former issue, although microscopic theories of effective interaction have been developed over decades, some empirical corrections are still needed for describing a wide range of nuclei belonging to a given shell. In particular, the monopole components of effective interactions-the parts responsible for the evolution of the shell structureare known to be subject to modification [2,3,5]. This so-called shell evolution plays a decisive role in the structure of exotic nuclei, and has been attracting much interest in this field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These flaws remind us of the divergence from experiment when the Kuo-Brown (KB) interaction [16] is applied to systems of many valence nucleons 48 Ca, 49 Ca etc [17]. The divergence was cured by modifying the monopole components of the T = 0 and T = 1 interaction matrix elements [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for heavier nuclei, the existing data are neither complete nor consistent. In many cases calculations are limited to selected nuclei with wave functions created by imposing various limitations on the model space and by employing various interactions (McGrory 1970, Meuders et al 1976, Koops and Glaudemans 1977, Van Hees and Glaudemans 1979, Kutschera et al 1978, Poves and Zuker 1981, Muto et al 1978, Cole 1985, McCullen et al 1964. The necessity to employ various truncated model spaces is dictated by the diagonalization procedure of matrices with enormously large dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%