Shell Model calculations of nuclear structure in ʺIsland of inversionʺ N=20 region: 32-36Mg isotopes

Ahmed, Firas Abed

doi:10.31349/revmexfis.67.051201

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These deviations illustrate the difference between the measured binding energies with the full BW-ten terms (BWMF-10 terms) and those with the BW plus one or two terms. A useful comparison of root mean-square deviation s between the present work and other different models [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] as seen in table 5. For most nuclei, the results of BWMF-10 terms are consistent in general (with deviations s smaller than two MeV).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 92%

Theoretical predictions of nuclear binding energy for the observed nuclei: the influence of coefficients and terms in a semi-empirical mass formula

Saad,

Elghobary

2024

Phys. Scr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to calculate the nuclear binding energy for the 2457 nuclei which experimentally observed, as tabulated in the atomic mass evaluation AME2020, by using the semi-empirical mass formula based on the renowned liquid drop model (LDM). The Bethe-Weizsäcker (BW) mass formula-four terms (BWMF-4T) is extended to incorporate an additional six terms, resulting in a formula of ten terms. Our findings demonstrate commendable accuracy and reliability, as substantiated by the acceptable level of uncertainty observed when compared them to experimental data and existing models. The influence of coefficients and terms in the semi-empirical mass formula has been determined. All possible combinations of the terms are fitted in turn to the measured nuclear masses, and the outcomes are analyzed in order to reveal correlations and mutual influences between the various terms in all observed mass regions of the periodic table. The fitted surface energy and symmetry coefficients in the Semi-empirical mass formula-ten terms (SEMF-10T) are remaining 26.4 and 33.3 MeV respectively. In contrast, coefficients fitted in the classic BW formula with and without one or two additional terms are around 17 and 23 MeV, respectively. The interplay between different terms in this mass formula is found to be significant and interesting.

show abstract