1971
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.3.2238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shell-Model Calculations forV51andCr52

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a more sensitive test the SDI wave functions for model spaces I to IV were used to calculate the Table 9 together with their experimental counterparts and the KB results of Rustgi et al [27]. Magnetic dipole transitions between pure f7~2 states as contained in model space I are prohibited since the M 1 operator of the extra-core protons is directly proportional to the angular momentum operator J (see Eq.…”
Section: Static Nuclear Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a more sensitive test the SDI wave functions for model spaces I to IV were used to calculate the Table 9 together with their experimental counterparts and the KB results of Rustgi et al [27]. Magnetic dipole transitions between pure f7~2 states as contained in model space I are prohibited since the M 1 operator of the extra-core protons is directly proportional to the angular momentum operator J (see Eq.…”
Section: Static Nuclear Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] improved on these two studies by using effective excitations to both the lp3/2 and 0f5/2 proton shells and including all nuclei with N =28 and 20<Z<28. In a follow-up study restricted to the 51V and S2Cr nuclei, Rustgi et al [27] used a complete Of-lp proton configuration space and the Kuo-Brown renormalized interaction matrix elements [28]. In the final calculation admixing from the (0f7/2) n-10fs/2 configuration was included using additional matrix elements calculated with a modified surface delte interaction (MSDI) [25,26] which was chosen to fit the effective interaction (EI) of the initial calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%