Shelf Sandstones of the Deep Wilcox Trend, Central Texas Gulf Coast

May, Jeffrey A.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0160-9_7

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Accommodation of the growth strata is created by deformation of the underlying slope mudstones, inferred to have had high initial porosities, and thus were easily mobilized (Winker, 1982;Galloway et al, 2000). Along the central Texas Gulf Coast, the Cretaceous Edwards and Sligo reef tracts are stacked (May, 1993). Therefore, Wilcox growth faults sole-out below the Sligo shelf edge (May, 1993) and maintain their position by continual expansion rather than stepping outward (Fig.…”

Section: Structural Deformationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Depositional Processes at the Lower Wilcox Shelf–Slope Transition Zone

Olariu,

Zeng

2013

GCAGS Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recognition of sand bypass at the shelf margin is key to deep-water exploration. This study examines the shelf margin architecture of the Lower Wilcox Group in Texas by combining wireline log with 3D seismic data. During the early Paleocene a relatively extensive (50 km wide), shallow-shelf platform extended across Central Texas making it difficult for the deltas to reach the shelf edge. The seaward pinchout of Lower Wilcox sandstone-rich shoreface deposits is about 20 km updip from the contemporaneous shelf edge indicating that sand remained on the inner and middle shelf and that the shelf margin grew through mud accretion. Highstand sea-level conditions favored the generation of hyperpycnal flows that incised into shelf deposits, with sand bypassed onto upper and middle slopes. In areas of shale withdrawal, extensional features such as growth faults produced long, linear to arcuate strike-elongate depocenters within hanging-walls of faults and dictated sediment delivery pathways. Our work suggests that significant volumes of deep-water sands were deposited from hyperpycnal flows initiated by direct river effluents that accumulated on the upper slope. High-density hyperpycnal flows created sand-filled slope-channel complexes 10–20 m thick and 200 m to more than 1 km wide that served as conduits for bypass to the basin floor. Unconfined, low-density hyperpycnal flows deposited lobes on the upper slope. Lobes spread 10–20 km laterally and 2–4 km downdip, with a maximum total sand thickness of 100 m. A high net-to-gross ratio (0.6) suggests the sand-rich component of the flow was deposited on the upper slope, while finer-grained sediment continued downslope. The shelf-margin architecture exhibited by this sequence serves as an example of hyperpycnal flows being the main initiator of turbidity currents for sand accumulation on the slope.

show abstract

Section: Structural Deformationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Along the central Texas Gulf Coast, the Cretaceous Edwards and Sligo reef tracts are stacked (May, 1993). Therefore, Wilcox growth faults sole-out below the Sligo shelf edge (May, 1993) and maintain their position by continual expansion rather than stepping outward (Fig. 5B).…”

Section: Structural Deformationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Depositional Processes at the Lower Wilcox Shelf–Slope Transition Zone

Olariu,

Zeng

2013

GCAGS Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Shelf Sandstones of the Deep Wilcox Trend, Central Texas Gulf Coast

Cited by 1 publication

References 19 publications

Depositional Processes at the Lower Wilcox Shelf–Slope Transition Zone

Depositional Processes at the Lower Wilcox Shelf–Slope Transition Zone

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About