2006
DOI: 10.1515/crelle.2006.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sheaves of t-structures and valuative criteria for stable complexes

Abstract: 1.1.1. Results on sheaves of t-structures. In section 2 we are given a nondegenerate t-structure (D(X) ≤0 , D(X) ≥0 ) with heart C = D(X) ≤0 ∩ D(X) ≥0 (see section 1.2 for definitions and a brief introduction). For a smooth projective variety S with ample line bundle L we defineAssuming that C is noetherian we prove

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
185
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, and so by the Hodge index theorem, we have Re(Z(E)) > 0, Re(Z(E[1])) < 0, and Z(E [1]) ∈ H, as desired.…”
Section: Definition ([Hrs96]) a Pair Of Full Subcategoriesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, and so by the Hodge index theorem, we have Re(Z(E)) > 0, Re(Z(E[1])) < 0, and Z(E [1]) ∈ H, as desired.…”
Section: Definition ([Hrs96]) a Pair Of Full Subcategoriesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Below the critical "wall" value t = 1 2 , we will have µ Z (O S (H)) > µ Z (i * O C (H)), exhibiting i * O C (H) as an unstable object of A # (!). The "replacement" stable object(s) will be of the form: Our moduli functor is based upon the generalized notion of a flat family we learned from Abramovich and Polishchuk [AP06]. One would, of course, like to have an a priori construction of moduli spaces of Bridgeland-stable objects via some sort of invariant theory argument, but the fact that we are not working exclusively with coherent sheaves makes it difficult to see how to make such a construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent works [AS12, AHR15] on good quotients for Artin stacks may lead to a general answer to this question, though. Once a coarse moduli space exists, then separatedness and properness of the moduli space is a general result by Abramovich and Polishchuk [AP06], which we will review in Section 8.…”
Section: Moduli Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that the technique in [AP06] is also very useful in the study of the geometry of the moduli space itself. This will also be reviewed in Section 8.…”
Section: Moduli Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation