2009
DOI: 10.1002/mana.200910097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sheaves of C*‐algebras

Abstract: We develop the basics of a theory of sheaves of C*-algebras and, in particular, compare it to the existing theory of C*-bundles. The details of two fundamental examples, the local multiplier sheaf and the injective envelope sheaf, are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there is y ∈ I such that y + t = a + t and hence N (a − y)(t) = 0. The continuity of the norm function at t (see [5,Lemma 6.4…”
Section: The Second Local Multiplier Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, there is y ∈ I such that y + t = a + t and hence N (a − y)(t) = 0. The continuity of the norm function at t (see [5,Lemma 6.4…”
Section: The Second Local Multiplier Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved in [21] that if A is a separable unital C*-algebra, then M loc (M loc (A)) = M loc (A), provided that the primitive ideal space Prim(A) contains a dense G δ subset of closed points. One of our goals here is to see how this result can be obtained in a straightforward manner using the techniques developed in [5]. The key to our argument is the following observation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noteworthy that in the early environment of the sheaf theory of Banach spaces one thought about sheaves of Banach spaces mostly in terms of those that corresponded to bundles, that is, in terms of the so called approximation sheaves ( [34], p. 423, 3.5), wheras the sheaves in the recent study [1] are sheaves in the strict categorical sense of the word. The question whether or not the sheaf M A is an approximation sheaf is not raised in [1]. On the level of logic and topos theory the article of Banaschewski and Mulvey [5] provided a new foundational caliber for the sheaf aspect at a high level of abstraction.…”
Section: Bundles Versus Sheavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in [7,Section 1], every C * -algebra is a C 0 (X)-algebra, typically in many ways. C 0 (X)-algebras have been studied in [3,8,13,14,15,20,28]. In [6, Section 1], we saw that if A is a C 0 (X)-algebra then corresponding to each x ∈ X there are two natural ideals H x and J x in M(A) which one might hope would be equal but in fact need not be so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%