2016
DOI: 10.1090/conm/669/13423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shearer’s inequality and infimum rule for Shannon entropy and topological entropy

Abstract: We review subbadditivity properties of Shannon entropy, in particular, from the Shearer's inequality we derive the "infimum rule" for actions of amenable groups. We briefly discuss applicability of the "infimum formula" to actions of other groups. Then we pass to topological entropy of a cover. We prove Shearer's inequality for disjoint covers and give counterexamples otherwise. We also prove that, for actions of amenable groups, the supremum over all open covers of the "infimum fomula" gives correct value of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Z, Theorem 4.2 in [9] asserts that Definition 2.2 agrees with Definition 2.1. The next fact was proven by Bowen in [7].…”
Section: Additional Notementioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the case of Z, Theorem 4.2 in [9] asserts that Definition 2.2 agrees with Definition 2.1. The next fact was proven by Bowen in [7].…”
Section: Additional Notementioning
confidence: 94%
“…A k ‐cover (kN) of a set FFin(G) is a tuple (K1,,Kr) of elements of Fin(G) such that for each gF the set {1ir:gKi} has at least k elements. A function H:Fin(G){}[0,): satisfies Shearer's inequality (see ) if for any FFin(G) and any k‐cover (K1,,Kr) of F, we have Hfalse(Ffalse)false(1/kfalse)(Hfalse(K1false)++Hfalse(Krfalse)), is G ‐invariant if H(Fg)=H(F) for every gG and FFin(G), is monotone if for all A,BFin(G) wi...…”
Section: Besicovitch Pseudometric and Weyl Pseudometricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let FFin(G) and let (K1,,Kr) be a kcover of F. Because every element of F belongs to Ki for at least k indices 1ir, we have trueright1k(Hfalse(K1false)++Hfalse(Krfalse))left1ksupgG(normalΔK1gfalse(x̲,x̲false)++normalΔKrgfalse(x̲,x̲false))left1ksupgG(knormalΔFgfalse(x̲,x̲false))=H(F).By [, Proposition 3.3] every G‐invariant, non‐negative function on Fin(G) that satisfies Sharer's inequality, obeys the infimum rule.…”
Section: Besicovitch Pseudometric and Weyl Pseudometricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the consideration in [7] for the naive entropy of measure-preserving actions, Burton introduced the naive topological entropy of X in [8]. This is also studied in [11]. For a finite open cover U of X , denote by N (U) the minimal cardinality of subcovers of U.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for U ranging over finite open covers of X . It is known that the naive entropy h nv ( X ) coincides with the classical topological entropy when is amenable [11,Theorem 6.8]. When is sofic, if h nv ( X ) = 0, then the sofic topological entropy of X with respect to any sofic approximation sequence of is either −∞ or 0 (see [8,Theorem 1.1] and [34,Propositions 4.6 and 4.16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%