2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear wave velocity prediction based on LSTM and its application for morphology identification and saturation inversion of gas hydrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed new NN reduced the error of the CNN by 38 times. A gas hydrate morphology and saturation prediction behavior were proposed by You . Their findings suggest that machine learning techniques using the LSTM method perform better than LSF in the predictions of the shear wave velocity and hydrate morphologies.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Gas Hydrate Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed new NN reduced the error of the CNN by 38 times. A gas hydrate morphology and saturation prediction behavior were proposed by You . Their findings suggest that machine learning techniques using the LSTM method perform better than LSF in the predictions of the shear wave velocity and hydrate morphologies.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Gas Hydrate Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GHBS samples from the Nankai Trough of Japan were used to develop a machine learning model for the estimation of hydrate reservoirs’ tensile and shear strength . GHBS data from the Korean East Sea region, Shenhu area, South China Sea (SH7), and Alaminos Canyon (Block 21) are practical field data used to develop machine learning models for predicting hydrate sediments, gas hydrate saturation, and morphologies. In areas such as Ulleung Basin, Korea, Mackenzie Delta (Canada), and on the Alaska north slope (USA), reservoir data have been used to develop machine learning models to characterize gas hydrate reservoirs and determine and estimate the hydrate rocks’ mineral compositions …”
Section: Machine Learning In Hydrate Field Data Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterizing hydrate growth habits in fine-grained sediments is crucial for developing hydrate deposits. However, it is challenging to obtain high-saturation hydrates in fine-grained sedimentary sediments in the laboratory as those found in nature. In recent years, machine learning techniques (e.g., neural network, support vector machine, and Markov chain) have been widely used in the oil and gas industry to process geophysical data for pattern recognition or parameter prediction. However, there are few applications in hydrate studies. Machine learning shows better generalization performance and compensates for gaps in researchers’ knowledge of physical laws.…”
Section: Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, machine learning techniques (e.g., neural network, support vector machine, and Markov chain) have been widely used in the oil and gas industry to process geophysical data for pattern recognition or parameter prediction. However, there are few applications in hydrate studies. Machine learning shows better generalization performance and compensates for gaps in researchers’ knowledge of physical laws.…”
Section: Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feng et al (2021) used random forest to predict well logs and evaluated simultaneously the uncertainty of the prediction. You et al (2021) proposed to use transfer learning to improve the performance of LSTM and applied the prediction results to morphology identification and saturation inversion of gas hydrate. Wang et al (2021) proposed a spatialtemporal neural network (STNN) algorithm that combines the advantages of CNN and LSTM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%