2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-013-9545-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear wave velocity measurements and soil–pile system identifications in dynamic centrifuge tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BE tests were conducted to provide information on the shear (G) and Young's (E) moduli. From the S-wave velocity (υS), the small strain shear modulus (Gmax), was determined, using the elastic wave velocity according to the equation [43,44]:…”
Section: Frequency Dependencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BE tests were conducted to provide information on the shear (G) and Young's (E) moduli. From the S-wave velocity (υS), the small strain shear modulus (Gmax), was determined, using the elastic wave velocity according to the equation [43,44]:…”
Section: Frequency Dependencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shear wave velocity can be measured by determining the shear wave travel time between two transducers spaced at a known distance. Several methods have been developed by centrifuge modelers to generate shear waves in-flight, including the use of bender elements (Brandenberg et al 2006;Lee et al 2012;Kim 2010;Lee et al 2014) and air-hammers (Ghosh and Madabhushi 2002;Arulnathan et al 2000).…”
Section: Small Strain Shear Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the modeling centrifuge was accelerated step by step up to 80 g, and the increment of acceleration in each step is 10 g. The model was maintained and lasted for 3 minutes at each step to ensure the consolidation of model at current overburden pressure. At 80 g, the model was detected by pre-shaking technique [20] and then excited by a one-dimensional sinusoidal input waves with 15 cycles and amplitude of about 0.4 g.…”
Section: Model Preparation and Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%