2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12182969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear-Wave Tomography Using Ocean Ambient Noise with Interference

Abstract: Ambient noise carries abundant subsurface structure information and attracts ever-increasing attention in the past decades. However, there are lots of interference factors in the ambient noise in the real world, making the noise difficult to be utilized in seismic interferometry. The paper performs shear-wave tomography on a very short recording of ocean ambient noise with interference. An adapted eigenvalue-based filter is adopted as a pre-processing method to deal with the strong, directional interference pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two Geophysics Manuscript, Accepted Pending: For Review Not Production different inversion procedures are carried out to obtain the velocity profiles: (1) a linearized inversion (Caiti et al, 1994) and (2) a non-linear inversion, the Adaptive Simplex Simulated Annealing (ASSA) inversion (Dosso et al, 2001). These procedures were chosen as they are well-established methods already used in various cases (see, e.g., Dong et al (2006); Wu et al (2020)). Additionally, we use two different inversion methods to compare their performance and estimated shear-wave velocity profiles.…”
Section: Surface Wave Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two Geophysics Manuscript, Accepted Pending: For Review Not Production different inversion procedures are carried out to obtain the velocity profiles: (1) a linearized inversion (Caiti et al, 1994) and (2) a non-linear inversion, the Adaptive Simplex Simulated Annealing (ASSA) inversion (Dosso et al, 2001). These procedures were chosen as they are well-established methods already used in various cases (see, e.g., Dong et al (2006); Wu et al (2020)). Additionally, we use two different inversion methods to compare their performance and estimated shear-wave velocity profiles.…”
Section: Surface Wave Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a prescribed number of perturbations, the control parameter is reduced. The process is repeated until the difference between the highest and lowest mismatch models relative to their average is less than a specified convergence factor (Li et al, 2012;Wu et al, 2020). More information on the various aspects of the inversion can be found in Dosso et al (2001).…”
Section: Adaptive Simplex Simulated Annealing (Assa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inversion performances of the proposed DQN framework and three alternative methods (GA, DE, and ASSA) are examined in two numerical experiments. Two geoacoustic models based on real scenarios in [2,26] are defined to increase the reality of the simulation. To increase the reliability of the evaluation, the inversion results discussed in this section are averaged over 100 independent inversions.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case 1 defines a six-layer geoacoustic model referenced from the inversion results in the Grane field [26], as shown in Table 4. The phase velocity dispersion curves for the first five modes of the Scholte waves are calculated in the frequency range from 0 to 5 Hz as the ground truth.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This significantly complicates the solution methods and requires a detailed analysis of all the features of a specific task. Statistical analysis of individual noise sources, as well as studies aimed at obtaining information in the presence of noise that distorts the useful signal, have already found application in many works (see, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%