1996
DOI: 10.1029/96gl02263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear wave splitting in the mantle Ps phases

Abstract: Distribution with depth of mantle anisotropy is uncertain. To better constrain this distribution, we analyse records of the mantle Ps phases at the GRF array in Germany. Two components of these phases (SV and T) are detected by stacking teleseismic records of events well distributed in azimuth and distance. The detected T component signals are generated not so much by splitting of SV as by conversion from P to SH at the mantle discontinuities. To reconcile these observations with previously known observations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of dipping interfaces or anisotropy always complicates the interpretation of receiver functions [Cassidy, 1992;Vinnik and Montagner, 1996]; by removing the differences in receiver functions caused by variations in incidence angle, we have made it easier to identify other differences that reflect dipping or anisotropic structure. structure, we will defer examination of the tangential receiver functions to a later work (C. H. Jones et al, manuscript in preparation, 1998).…”
Section: Comparing and Compositing Receiver Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of dipping interfaces or anisotropy always complicates the interpretation of receiver functions [Cassidy, 1992;Vinnik and Montagner, 1996]; by removing the differences in receiver functions caused by variations in incidence angle, we have made it easier to identify other differences that reflect dipping or anisotropic structure. structure, we will defer examination of the tangential receiver functions to a later work (C. H. Jones et al, manuscript in preparation, 1998).…”
Section: Comparing and Compositing Receiver Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wadsleyite to ringwoodite transformation results in the lowering of anisotropy with depth (see Table 1) in the lower part of the transition zone, whereas the exsolution of Ca-perovskite from majorite garnet would result in an increase. Recent seismic studies by Vinnik and co-workers (Vinnik and Montagner, 1996;Vinnik et al, 1997) show evidence for a weakly anisotropic (1.5%) layer for S-waves at the bottom 40 km of the transition zone (620-660 km). The global tomography models (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, although great heterogeneity of anisotropy with depth has been suggested, this heterogeneity remains to be demonstrated conclusively. Efforts to constrain the anisotropic region using seismological methods have been made by many researchers (e.g., Herquel et al, 1995;Vinnik and Montagner, 1996). Vinnik and Montagner (1996) used weak P-to-S converted waves from stacked seismograms to determine anisotropy in the mantle transition zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to constrain the anisotropic region using seismological methods have been made by many researchers (e.g., Herquel et al, 1995;Vinnik and Montagner, 1996). Vinnik and Montagner (1996) used weak P-to-S converted waves from stacked seismograms to determine anisotropy in the mantle transition zone. Iidaka and Niu (1998) and lower mantle anisotropy by comparing waveform of SKS and P660s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%