2001
DOI: 10.1006/niox.2001.0373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear Stress-Induced Nitric Oxide Release Triggers the Liver Regeneration Cascade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
129
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
129
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Immediately after the operation, the portal pressure and microcirculatory blood flow of PVNL lobes showed substantial increase, whereas noteworthy microcirculatory impairment was observed in the PVL lobes. These hemodynamic alterations are considered as an important driving force for the induced morphologic changes [20]. Total cessation of the portal venous inflow led to atrophy of the PVL lobes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediately after the operation, the portal pressure and microcirculatory blood flow of PVNL lobes showed substantial increase, whereas noteworthy microcirculatory impairment was observed in the PVL lobes. These hemodynamic alterations are considered as an important driving force for the induced morphologic changes [20]. Total cessation of the portal venous inflow led to atrophy of the PVL lobes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased blood flow to liver mass ratio immediately after hepatectomy (pHx), and the resulting increased intrahepatic shear stress have been proposed to stimulate and regulate liver regeneration [2][3][4]. On the other hand, the liver cannot directly control the portal venous blood flow (PVBF), and has to accept the entire outflow from the upstream splanchnic organs [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 In line with this, the increase of proliferative factor activity and c-fos mRNA expression in hepatectomized rats, serving as two indices of the initiation of the liver regeneration cascade, could be inhibited by the NOS antagonist L-NAME, while a NO donor reversed inhibition. 10 On the contrary, it has been shown that both endogenous NO synthesis and exogenous NO delivery resulted in delayed liver recovery in hepatectomized mice. 48 The present data provides an explanation to this contradiction in that NO seems not to be mandatory for the liver to sufficiently regenerate upon resection, as far as vasotonic control is adequately maintained by a proportionate HO-1 response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Within this context, nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO)-liberating enzyme systems may play a particular role as both gaseous mediators are released upon enhanced shear stress. [7][8][9][10][11] It has been reported that these two gaseous transmitter systems are closely linked in that both systems NO producing nitric oxide synthase (NOS) as well as CO releasing heme oxygenase (HO) are capable of modulating each others activity [12][13][14] and to some extent even in a reciprocal organ specific manner. 15 This close association seems to be of particular importance since only the synergistic interaction of CO, NO and HO-1 could demonstrate beneficial effects on the cellular level in a model of tumor necrosis factor a-induced hepatocyte cell death in mice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%