2016
DOI: 10.12989/sem.2016.57.4.657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear strength estimation of RC deep beams using the ANN and strut-and-tie approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaya [16] determined the optimum horizontal and vertical reinforcement diameters of five different beams by using genetic algorithms due to the opening/height ratio, loading condition and the presence of spaces in the body. Yavuz [17] investigated the efficiency of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in predicting the shear strength of RC deep beams. He developed an ANN model using experimental data for deep beams from an existing literature database.…”
Section: Smith and Vantsiotismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kaya [16] determined the optimum horizontal and vertical reinforcement diameters of five different beams by using genetic algorithms due to the opening/height ratio, loading condition and the presence of spaces in the body. Yavuz [17] investigated the efficiency of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in predicting the shear strength of RC deep beams. He developed an ANN model using experimental data for deep beams from an existing literature database.…”
Section: Smith and Vantsiotismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it can be written in the form of Eq. (17). (17) where K represents the RC element stiffness matrix, Q represents the resisting force vector of the element, K B and K b represent the element and bond contributions to the stiffness matrix, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concrete compressive strength, the provided top/bottom reinforcements, and web reinforcements in terms of amount and spacing all form the shear resistance of these deep beams [1,2,4,5]. In literature, plenty of analytical and numerical studies have been focused on the ultimate shear strength assessment of such beams with large depths compared to their spans [2,3,[6][7][8][9]. Unavoidable discrepancies were found with the implementation of both analytical/numerical methods compared to the experimental results [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure in ductility was more likely to occur with an increase in shear span to depth ratio and a decrease in longitudinal reinforcement. Yavuz (2016) took a different approach to investigating STM by calculating the shear strength of an RC deep beam with artificial neural networks (ANNs). Using different parameters affecting shear taken from experimental statistics and the literature database, they concluded that the ANN approach is better for predicting shear strength when compared to STM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%