2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2018.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear rheology of fluid interfaces: Closing the gap between macro- and micro-rheology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method relies on the measurement of the force felt by a micrometric particle moving in the plane parallel to the interface at a given particle-interface distance using an optical trap. Such methodology overcomes the ambiguity of interface macrorheology while keeping the analysis simpler than in contact microrhelogy, as it avoids the issue related to the understanding of the not trivial interaction between the interface and the particle probe [32] [33]. Some articles have been dedicated to analyze this opportunity [34,35], which allows the study of the rheological properties even of phases with very low viscosity (≈ 10 −9 N.s.m −1 ).…”
Section: Towards Contactless Surface Microrheologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method relies on the measurement of the force felt by a micrometric particle moving in the plane parallel to the interface at a given particle-interface distance using an optical trap. Such methodology overcomes the ambiguity of interface macrorheology while keeping the analysis simpler than in contact microrhelogy, as it avoids the issue related to the understanding of the not trivial interaction between the interface and the particle probe [32] [33]. Some articles have been dedicated to analyze this opportunity [34,35], which allows the study of the rheological properties even of phases with very low viscosity (≈ 10 −9 N.s.m −1 ).…”
Section: Towards Contactless Surface Microrheologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a practical point of view, an essential characteristic of each of the above-mentioned ISRs is their respective measuring range in a parameter space defined by η s , η s , and ω. In this aspect, assessing the performance of the flow field based-iterative process is of paramount importance, particularly in the case of the bicone ISR, due to the comparatively higher role played by the subphase because of the larger subphase contact with the probe's lower surface, which renders comparatively lower values of Bo * [9]. Limited studies [20,23] of the available measuring range and the errors introduced by the iterative process have been made in the case of the bicone ISR.…”
Section: Check Convergence Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full characterization of the mechanical properties of plane interfacial systems requires studying the mechanical response in two deformation modes [8][9][10], namely shear mode, which keeps the area constant while allowing for shape changes [9], and dilatational mode, which keeps the shape unchanged while allowing for area changes [10]. In this report, we will restrict ourselves to the shear deformation mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For intermediate the material response contains both bulk, given by phases 1 and 2, and biofilm contributions to the interfacial flow [ 33 ] (see also the method description ahead). Defining the lower measurable limits, , of interfacial rheological techniques is not a trivial matter and depends, among others, on the measuring geometry, measurement instrument, and so on, as highlighted in [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. In this work, we use , as previously used in similar studies in terms of experimental setup and materials [ 33 , 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%