2002
DOI: 10.1002/jps.10140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear‐Induced Degradation of Plasmid DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
83
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has to be understood that the shear stresses induced varies depending on the size of the DNA. For a given physical agitation, the imparted tensional force is pro-(b) (a) portional to the 1st to 2nd power of the molecular weight of a DNA particle [2]. For linear DNA chains, the exponent was found to be 1.2 by Bowman and Davidson [5].…”
Section: Shear Degradation By Pipetting Vortexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It has to be understood that the shear stresses induced varies depending on the size of the DNA. For a given physical agitation, the imparted tensional force is pro-(b) (a) portional to the 1st to 2nd power of the molecular weight of a DNA particle [2]. For linear DNA chains, the exponent was found to be 1.2 by Bowman and Davidson [5].…”
Section: Shear Degradation By Pipetting Vortexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We confirmed this expectation by observing no substantial degradation of X-bal-digested lambda DNA (24.5 kbp) following application of the aforementioned manipulations (data not shown). In mass production environment, smaller DNA (5 kbp plasmid) is found to be insensitive to shear-induced degradation [2,3]. On the other hand, DNA particles substantially larger than lambda DNA would be readily fragmented by these manipulations.…”
Section: Shear Degradation By Pipetting Vortexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequent lysis of E. coli cells are carried out using a modified version of previously reported methods (Ciccolini et al 2002;Meacle et al 2004;Clemson and Kelly 2010). Modifications to this step are especially important due to the potential for pDNA damage from caustic solvents and shear stresses (Lengsfeld and Anchordoquy 2001;Freitas et al 2007). Briefly, the cell pellet is resuspended to 150 g/L cell in resuspension buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0).…”
Section: Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%