2020
DOI: 10.18502/fid.v16i5.2286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear Bond Strength of Molar Tubes to Enamel Using an Orthodontic Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Amorphous Calcium Phosphate

Abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of molar tubes to the enamel surface of molar teeth using a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) cement modified with amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP). Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, 60 extracted human third molars were randomly divided into four groups for bonding of molar tubes to the enamel surface. Fuji Ortho LC and Fuji Ortho LC modified with ACP (1.55 wt%) were used in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In group 3, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research that compared the strength of an orthodontic bracket to enamel surfaces following the use of RMGI and resin composites have reported different results. [26][27] In the present study, the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces when using the resin composite was slightly higher than that…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Previous research that compared the strength of an orthodontic bracket to enamel surfaces following the use of RMGI and resin composites have reported different results. [26][27] In the present study, the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces when using the resin composite was slightly higher than that…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…In both ageing groups, the NFRA had the highest value of mean SBS, while the PLFRA had the least value of mean SBS among the tested adhesives, but above clinically acceptable SBS. This outcome might be based on that the enamel surfaces in this group were conditioned with 37% phosphoric acid instead of the polyacrylic acid conditioner, this would produce rougher enamel surface, and consequently enhanced the bond strength; this explanation was reported by Cacciafesta et al (21) and Tanbakuchi et al (22) Another possible explanation is that the enamel surfaces were adequately wet during the bonding procedure, otherwise the SBS would be adversely affected if the enamel surface was desiccated. (23) The current study demonstrated that there was highly significant difference between the NFRA and PLFRA groups, these observations were congruent with Yassaei et al (24) , who concluded that the Fuji Ortho LC had a significantly reduced SBS values compared to Transbond XT for metal and ceramic brackets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%