2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-019-01909-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear Behavior of the Interface Between Rock and Cemented Backfill: Effect of Curing Stress, Drainage Condition and Backfilling Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of CPB has been studied quite extensively (e.g., Kesimal et al (2005); Klein and Simon (2006); Orejarena and Fall (2010); Yi et al (2015); Gorakhki and Bareither (2017); and Xu et al (2018)), in part because it is the least resource intensive, but also because there are many limit equilibrium design methods that depend on UCS as a key input (e.g., Mitchell et al (1982) and Potvin et al (2005)). Less attention has been paid to tests that study mechanical properties and effects of cemented bond breakage on the behavior of cured CPB under more complex loading conditions (Pierce et al 1998;Yilmaz et al 2010;Yilmaz et al 2015;Fang and Fall 2020;Jafari et al 2020a;Jafari et al 2020b). Therefore, new information about CPB's response to high confining pressures is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of CPB has been studied quite extensively (e.g., Kesimal et al (2005); Klein and Simon (2006); Orejarena and Fall (2010); Yi et al (2015); Gorakhki and Bareither (2017); and Xu et al (2018)), in part because it is the least resource intensive, but also because there are many limit equilibrium design methods that depend on UCS as a key input (e.g., Mitchell et al (1982) and Potvin et al (2005)). Less attention has been paid to tests that study mechanical properties and effects of cemented bond breakage on the behavior of cured CPB under more complex loading conditions (Pierce et al 1998;Yilmaz et al 2010;Yilmaz et al 2015;Fang and Fall 2020;Jafari et al 2020a;Jafari et al 2020b). Therefore, new information about CPB's response to high confining pressures is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, most of the related research focuses on the mechanical properties of surrounding rock and backfill. For example, Fang and Fall [24] studied the shear mechanical properties of the interface between backfill and a rock mass. The characteristics of the mechanical interaction between backfill and a rock mass under the condition of creep behaviour were investigated by Qi and Fourie [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a better understanding of this arching effect, especially the shear behavior of the CPB-rock interface, allows for the design of a more economic and safer CPB structure. Few experimental studies have been performed to investigate the shear behavior of the CPB-rock interface [4,20,[26][27][28][29][30]. These studies have mainly concentrated on the external conditions, such as the normal stress, curing time, curing temperature, and sulfate attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) To study the effect of the initial sulfate concentration on the behavior of a 1-day-old FR-CPB and rock interface; (2) To evaluate the effect of treatment time and the initial sulfate concentration on the behavior of the FR-CPB and rock interface (1-, 3-, 7-, and 28-day-old interface); (3) To compare the effect of the initial sulfate concentration on the interface behavior of FR-CPB material with various fiber contents (after 7 days of curing); Few experimental studies have been performed to investigate the shear behavior of the CPB-rock interface [4,20,[26][27][28][29][30]. These studies have mainly concentrated on the external conditions, such as the normal stress, curing time, curing temperature, and sulfate attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation