2000
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2000)126:6(495)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear Band Formation in Plane Strain Experiments of Sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
85
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
11
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once compacted, the sample will be sheared biaxially under different confining pressures. The testing procedure consists of two different phases in analogy with experimental procedures used in soil mechanics biaxial and triaxial tests (Figures 1b and 1c) [e.g., Bardet, 1997;Alshibli and Sture, 2000]. First, the sample is subjected to a uniform confining pressure along its boundaries.…”
Section: Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once compacted, the sample will be sheared biaxially under different confining pressures. The testing procedure consists of two different phases in analogy with experimental procedures used in soil mechanics biaxial and triaxial tests (Figures 1b and 1c) [e.g., Bardet, 1997;Alshibli and Sture, 2000]. First, the sample is subjected to a uniform confining pressure along its boundaries.…”
Section: Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oda et al 1978;Tatsuoka et al 1990, Alshibli andSture 2000;Wanatowski and Chu 2006), directional shear cells (Phillips and May 1967;Oda and Konishi 1974a, b;Wong and Arthur 1985), true triaxial apparatuses (Arthur and Menzies 1972;Yamada and Ishihara 1979;Ochiai and Lade 1983;Miura and Toki 1984;Abelev and Lade 2004) and hollow cylinder apparatuses (e.g., Symes et al 1988;Miura and Toki 1986;Vaid et al 1990;Gutierrez et al 1991;Nakata et al 1998;Rolo 2003;Lade et al 2008;Cai et al 2013). …”
Section: ! Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, standard test procedures (ASTM D5321-02) (ASTM, 2002) to determine the frictional strength of geosynthetic-soil interfaces are based on the direct shear test. For these reasons, more experimental and numerical studies on the test have been conducted in the past three decades (Arthur et al, 1977;Scarpelli & Wood, 1982;Jewell & Wroth, 1987;Potts et al, 1987;Palmeira & Milligan, 1989;Alshibli & Sture, 2000;Lings & Dietz, 2004;Cerato & Lutenegger, 2006;Wang et al, 2007b). Some major conclusions of these studies include: (a) stresses and strains within the final failure zone are fairly uniform and progressive failure effects are minor, despite the non-uniform stresses and strains imposed by the box (Jewell & Wroth, 1987;Potts et al, 1987); (b) the peak shear strength from DSA is very close to that obtained in an ideal simple shear condition, and the deviation of the zero linear extension direction at peak from the horizontal is negligible (Potts et al, 1987;Wang et al, 2007b); (c) multiple shear bands propagate from the edge of the box towards the middle of the specimen, appearing as a function of specimen length, height and soil density (Scarpelli & Wood, 1982;Wang et al, 2007b); (d ) the measured friction angle generally decreases with increasing box size above a certain box size to maximum particle diameter ratio, owing to the room available in the box for the shear zone to develop fully (Jewell & Wroth, 1987;Cerato & Lutenegger, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%