“…Furthermore, standard test procedures (ASTM D5321-02) (ASTM, 2002) to determine the frictional strength of geosynthetic-soil interfaces are based on the direct shear test. For these reasons, more experimental and numerical studies on the test have been conducted in the past three decades (Arthur et al, 1977;Scarpelli & Wood, 1982;Jewell & Wroth, 1987;Potts et al, 1987;Palmeira & Milligan, 1989;Alshibli & Sture, 2000;Lings & Dietz, 2004;Cerato & Lutenegger, 2006;Wang et al, 2007b). Some major conclusions of these studies include: (a) stresses and strains within the final failure zone are fairly uniform and progressive failure effects are minor, despite the non-uniform stresses and strains imposed by the box (Jewell & Wroth, 1987;Potts et al, 1987); (b) the peak shear strength from DSA is very close to that obtained in an ideal simple shear condition, and the deviation of the zero linear extension direction at peak from the horizontal is negligible (Potts et al, 1987;Wang et al, 2007b); (c) multiple shear bands propagate from the edge of the box towards the middle of the specimen, appearing as a function of specimen length, height and soil density (Scarpelli & Wood, 1982;Wang et al, 2007b); (d ) the measured friction angle generally decreases with increasing box size above a certain box size to maximum particle diameter ratio, owing to the room available in the box for the shear zone to develop fully (Jewell & Wroth, 1987;Cerato & Lutenegger, 2006).…”