2004
DOI: 10.1520/gtj12080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear Band Characterization of Triaxial Sand Specimens Using Computed Tomography

Abstract: A thorough quantitative analysis of the internal density distribution and strain localization of axisymmetric triaxial sand specimens is presented. Computed tomography technique was used to acquire detailed three-dimensional images of a series of Ottawa sand specimens subjected to Conventional Triaxial Compression (CTC) conditions at very low effective stresses in microgravity and terrestrial laboratories. Analysis tools were developed to quantify the distribution of local void ratio, track the onset, propagat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On a horizontal section through the damaged zone, we observe numerous dark spots (low density, probably large pores/discontinuities) as well as a pattern of bright radial linear structures (high-density zones) (Figure 14a). To our knowledge, such radial features have not been observed in triaxial loading experiments in consolidated rocks, but similar features were observed in [Batiste et al, 2004] (Figure 14b). Similar features have also been found experimentally by Desrues et al [1996] and were reproduced by Fazekas et al [2006] using distinct element method (DEM) numerical simulation on unconsolidated granular media.…”
Section: Strain Localization Patternssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…On a horizontal section through the damaged zone, we observe numerous dark spots (low density, probably large pores/discontinuities) as well as a pattern of bright radial linear structures (high-density zones) (Figure 14a). To our knowledge, such radial features have not been observed in triaxial loading experiments in consolidated rocks, but similar features were observed in [Batiste et al, 2004] (Figure 14b). Similar features have also been found experimentally by Desrues et al [1996] and were reproduced by Fazekas et al [2006] using distinct element method (DEM) numerical simulation on unconsolidated granular media.…”
Section: Strain Localization Patternssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…white arrows) which, in some cases, propagate toward the surfaces forming radial features. Such type of deformation with multiple radial fractures has been observed also by David et al (2015b) on Sherwood sandstone samples after injection tests, following the same experimental methodology, and by Batiste et al (2004) and Desrues et al (1996) on a sand pack deformed in triaxial experiments. The similarity between these observations lead David et al (2015b) to interpret such features as due to a loss of cohesion between the grains in the waterinvaded part.…”
Section: Microstructures Resulting From Injection Testssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…At axial strain, a = 25%, q/p was 1.25 for the loose specimens of Ottawa sand and Siligran and 1.4 for Q-Rok. All specimens continued to dilate even at large strains possibly due to formation of new shearing bands as seen in 3D computed tomography images [68][69][70]. Dilation was considerably greater for the dense specimens than for the loose specimens.…”
Section: Triaxial Testsmentioning
confidence: 92%